X11/SC12/TG14/1997-1
Minutes Subcommittee 12, Task Group 14, March 1997

Discussed in: SC12/TG14 xxx
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 8 Apr 1997

Published:
Apr 1997

X11/1997-16
Membership VAMC Houston

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: David J. Whitten
Membership

Submitted: 8 Apr 1997

Published:
Apr 1997

X11/1997-17
Letter from InterSystems, 14 March 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Paul D. Grabscheid
Administrative

Submitted: 8 Apr 1997
Description:
Letter from Paul Grabsheid, InterSystems, March 14, 1997. Concerns future direction of MDC.
Published:
Apr 1997

X11/SC16/1997-1
Object model features matrix

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Administrative

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
X3H7 Object Model Features Matrix. Discussion paper on analyzing object model interoperability issues. Mar 97: handout in San Diego. Not published.

X11/SC15/TG9/1997-3
Minutes Subcommittee 15, Task Group 9, September 1996

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997

Published:
Apr 1997

X11/1997-12
Letter to Paul Grabscheid, 8 April 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Administrative

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
Letter to Paul Grabscheid from Art Smith, April 8, 1997. Concerning his letter to the MDC about the future of the MDC (X11/97-17).
Published:
Apr 1997

X11/1997-14
Minutes MDC, 16 March 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997

Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as read passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC16/1997-2
Taking M[UMPS] beyond 2000, version 2

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Frans S.C. Witte
Subcommittee Type B

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
MAR 97: Proposed as a standing document of SC16.
Published:
Apr 1997

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-11, Taking M[UMPS] Beyond the Year 2000 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed without dissent.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-11, Taking M[UMPS] Beyond the Year 2000 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC16/1997-3
Omega draft standard, version 1c

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Subcommittee Type C

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
MAR 97: Omega draft standard version 1c. Handout March 1997 in San Diego. Not published.

X11/SC16/1997-5
Scope of Work Subcommittee 16

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Discussion

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
MAR 97: Scope and Schedule. Proposed as standing document.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as Scope of Work and Schedule for Subcommittee 16 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC16/1997-6
Bylaws Subcommittee 16

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Superseded by: X11/SC16/1997-7, Bylaws SC16, Version 2

Submitted: 11 Apr 1997
Description:
MAR 97: Proposed as standing document.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as Bylaws for Subcommittee 16 passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG8/1997-1
Document numbering, version 2

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/1997-11, Document numbering formal

Submitted: 15 Apr 1997
Description:
MAR 97: edited and accepted as standing document of MDC.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document superseding X11/TG8/1996-7, Document numbering passed by voice vote.
  

X11/1997-11
Document numbering formal

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Standing document

Submitted: 15 Apr 1997
Description:
Document Numbering Formalization March 1997: MDC accepted as standing document.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1997-1, Document numbering, version 2 as a standing document superseding X11/TG8/1996-7, Document numbering passed by voice vote.
  

X11/1997-15
Minutes MDC, 19 March 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 21 Apr 1997

Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 24 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG8/1997-3
Canvass procedure

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Standing document

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
MDC Procedures for Conducting a Canvass Process. SEPT 97: accepted as standing document 22-1-2.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-3
O[pen] command clarification, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-4, O[pen] command clarification, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-7, O[pen] command clarification, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-23, O[pen] command clarification, version 5

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
OPEN command clarification (re-OPEN) SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 amends and recommends elevation to SC12 type B without dissent. SC12 accepts as type B 12-0-5.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-1, O[pen] command clarification passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-4
More of the same

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-3, Duplicate keywords clarified
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-8, Duplicate keywords clarified, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-24, Duplicate keywords clarified, version 3

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 renames to Duplicate Keywords Clarified and recommends elevation to SC12 type B without dissent. SC12 accepts as type B 13-0-4.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-5
Device parameter issues, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Paul D. Grabscheid
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-2, Device parameter issues, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-9, Device parameter issues, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-25, Device parameter issues, version 5

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
Device Parameter Issues Sept 97: proposed for re-affirmation as SC type B. SC12/TG9 amends and tables for revised document. SC12 accepts as type B 12-0-5.
Published:
Apr 1997

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues (also known as X11/SC12/TG9/94-2 or X11/SC12/TG9/95-4) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues (also known as X11/SC12/TG9/94-2 or X11/SC12/TG9/95-4) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 3 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-6
Undefined devicekeyword

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-1, Undefined devicekeyword, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-11, Undefined devicekeyword, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-14, Undefined devicekeyword, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1999-2, Undefined devicekeyword, version 5

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC12 type B. SC12 makes it so 9-2-6.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1997-6
Define variable m in definition of $P[iece]

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-1, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-6, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-13, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 4
Superseded by: X11/1999-3, Define variable m in $P[iece], version 5

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC13 accepts as type C 18-0-1.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1997-7
Intrinsic function $LOCATION

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: motion to accept as SC13 type C failed 5-9-5.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 9 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1997-9
Unspecified, could that mean anything?, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-2, Unspecified, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1999-1, Unspecified... Can that mean everything? Version 4

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
Unspecified ... Could that mean anything? SEPT 97: SC15 remanded to TG 13-0-11.
Published:
Apr 1997

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1997-5, Unspecified, can that be everything? as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1997-5, Unspecified, can that be everything? passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 11 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1997-10
ASSIGN command

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
SEPT 98: SC15 did not accept as type C 1-11-1.
Published:
Apr 1997

Vote

• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 11 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG17/1997-6
D[o], G[oto] and X[ecute], if at all

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1999-1, Do, Goto, Xecute, if at all, version 2

Submitted: 23 Apr 1997
Description:
DO, GOTO, and XECUTE: If at all SEPT 98: SC15 accepts as type C 11-0-1. There is some question about the status of this document. The minutes indicate that it was approved as a type C even though it was proposed from the taskgroup as a type B.
Published:
Apr 1997
Oct 1998

Vote

• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/1997-13
Letter to Henry Heffernan 16 May 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Administrative

Submitted: 28 May 1997
Description:
Letter to HH from Art Smith, May 16, 1997, concerning Audit Report and satisfaction of all HH objections to last standards' approvals.
Published:
Aug 1997

X11/1997-18
ANSI audit report

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Administrative

Submitted: 28 May 1997
Description:
ANSI Audit Report for audit of February 6-7, 1997.
Published:
Aug 1997

X11/1997-19
AUDIT response 16 May 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Administrative

Submitted: 28 May 1997
Description:
Letter to ANSI from Art Smith, May 16, 1997, responding to Audit Report.
Published:
Aug 1997

X11/1997-20
Letter from MDC to ISO 30 May 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Administrative

Submitted: 11 Jul 1997
Description:
Letter to ISO secretariat granting permission to copy standards, from ASmith, 30 May 1997.

X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2
Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-21, Miscellaneous character functions, version 6

Submitted: 15 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12/TG2 amended and moved to recommend elevation to SC type A 7-0-1. SC12 makes it so 10-0-7.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2b as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions and X11/SC12/TG2/1996-3, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2a passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1996-7, Miscellaneous character functions, version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7
Null mnemonicspace, Version 3

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Submitted: 15 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 amends and recommends acceptance as SC12 type A without dissent. SC12 remands to TG9.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 and X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device passed 8 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2 as amended in task group as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand this document to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8
User definable I/O handling, Version 6

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 15 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12 amends.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5 as amended in task group 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3, X11/SC12/TG9/1996-5, User definable I/O handling, version 4a, X11/SC12/TG9/1996-6, User definable I/O handling, version 4b and X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5 failed by a vote of none in favor, 8 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9
Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-6, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, version 3

Submitted: 15 Jul 1997
Description:
Portable controlmnemonics $TEST and naked indicator. SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 recommends forwarding to MDC for elevation to MDC type A without dissent. SC12 demoted to type B 10-1-6.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8, User definable I/O handling amendment (part that relates to X11/95-95) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8, User definable I/O handling amendment passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator failed by a vote of none in favor, 12 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document passed (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1997-8
User defined ssvns, Version 7

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-2, User defined ssvns, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-7, User defined ssvns, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1998-19, User defined ssvns, version 10

Submitted: 15 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: MDC failed to elevate to type A 6-11-9.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 14 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1995-8, User Definable ssvns, version 1a as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1995-5, User Definable ssvns, version 3 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 12 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 12 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 11 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1997-5
OMI reverse $Q[uery], Version 3

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1997-30, OMI Reverse $Q[uery], version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 22 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: accepted as MDC type A 24-0-1.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1996-1, OMI reverse $Q[uery] as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 6 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1996-1, OMI reverse $Q[uery] passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1997-6
Output time-out, Version 3

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Gregory Vail
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1997-31, Output time out, version 4

Submitted: 22 Jul 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC12/TG9 amends. Accepted as MDC type A 19-0-6.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-14, Time Out on W[rite] Command as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-4, Output time out as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-14, Time Out on W[rite] Command passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-10, Output time out, version 2 as amended in task group 9 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-4, Output time out passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-10, Output time out, version 2 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to amend this document superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-10, Output time out, version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A (as amended) superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-10, Output time out, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1997-7
Scope of work SC12/TG14 1997

Discussed in: SC12/TG14 xxx
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Withdrawn

Submitted: 22 Jul 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG14/1996-2, Scope Subcommittee 12, Task Group 14 as Scope of Work and Schedule for SC12/TG14 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG14/1997-2
Agenda SC12/TG14 September 1997

Discussed in: SC12/TG14 xxx
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: George K. Yenoki
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 22 Jul 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

X11/SC12/1997-9
Name registration list, August 1997

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-3, Name registration list, February 1998
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1999-1, Name registration list April 1999

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new error codes) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new vendors) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of package names that start with X) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (error codes M46-M60) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (vendor codes 45-47) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to approve X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 superseding X11/SC12/1995-18, Name Registration List, October 1995 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document superseding X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 passed without dissent.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document superseding X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/TG13/1997-2
Canonic form of ssvn name, Version 3

Discussed in: SC15/TG13 ssvn Syntax
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-1, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-26, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 5

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC15 elevates to SC type A 23-0-2.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG17/1996-2, Canonic form of ssvn name as interpretation passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 6 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG13/1997-1, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/TG17/1996-2, Canonic form of ssvn name passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG13/1997-1, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 2 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1997-8
POSIX thin binding, Version 6

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-2, POSIX thin binding, version 7

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
Thin POSIX binding. Sept 97: proposed as replacement SC type B. SC12 makes it so 13-0-4.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG8/1994-5, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC13/TG9/1993-3, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG8/1994-7, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG8/1994-5, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 2 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-1, POSIX thin binding, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG8/1995-2, Comments on POSIX MUMPS Application Programmer Interface and X11/SC12/TG8/1995-3, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 4 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1997-1, POSIX thin binding, version 5 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3
Sockets binding

Discussed in: SC12/TG14 xxx
Proposer: Nancy L. Adams
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-1, Sockets binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-14, Sockets binding, version 3

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: proposed as replacement SC12 type B. SC12 elevates to type A instead 13-0-4.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to withdraw X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding as a Type C document of Subcommittee 14 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to amend X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-5, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-4, TCP/IP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding and X11/SC14/TG6/1995-3, TCP/IP-MUMPS Binding passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-8, Sockets-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-7, TCP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-1, Socket Requirements Comments and X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-1, Socket Requirements Comments and X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1997-4
$M[UMPS] function, Version 8

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-8, $M[UMPS] function, version 9

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC15/TG9 edited and recommended elevation to SC15 type A, without dissent. SC15 makes it so 17-2-5.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1993-16, $M[UMPS] Function, version 1 to Task Group 10 passed 23 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-1, $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1993-3, $M[UMPS] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 6 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-6, $M[UMPS] Function, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-1, $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/TG9/1994-10, $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 to Task Group superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-6, $M[UMPS] Function, version 4 passed 11 in favor and 6 opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC15/TG9/1995-7, $M[UMPS] Function, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-6, $M[UMPS] Function, version 4 and X11/SC15/TG9/1994-10, $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 4 opposed and 17 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1997-1, $M[UMPS] function, version 7 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-7, $M[UMPS] Function, version 6 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 4 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1997-1, $M[UMPS] function, version 7 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1997-5
Standard routineparameters, Version 8

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-9, Standard routineparameters, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-12, Standard routineparameters, version 10

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: proposed as replacement SC15 type B. SC15/TG9 recommends as replacement SC15 type B, without dissent. SC15 makes it so 18-0-6.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 and X11/SC15/TG9/95-6.1, Standard routineparameters, version 2 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-107, Standard routineparameters, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 6 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/TG9/1996-1, Standard routineparameters, version 5 to task group 9 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-107, Standard routineparameters, version 4 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1996-5, Standard routineparameters, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-1, Standard routineparameters, version 5 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1997-2, Standard routineparameters, version 7 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-5, Standard routineparameters, version 6 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1997-2, Standard routineparameters, version 7 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4
$O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 11 Aug 1997
Description:
Unsubscripted $ORDER.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-53, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-18, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16 to task group 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15 passed 18 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17 as amended by Subcommittee 13 at its previous meeting as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 17 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG2/1997-7
Minutes SC15/TG2 March 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: Charles M. Link III
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 12 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

X11/SC16/1997-7
Bylaws SC16, Version 2

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Standing document

Submitted: 12 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

Vote

• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC16/1997-6, Bylaws Subcommittee 16 as Bylaws for Subcommittee 16 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/TG4/1997-4
Event processing, Version 3

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Keith Snell
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG4/1998-1, Event processing, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-6, Event processing, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-28, Event processing, version 6

Submitted: 12 Aug 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: SC15/TG4 amended and recommended acceptance as replacement SC15 type B 9-0-2. SC15 makes it so 22-1-2.
Published:
Aug 1997

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG4/1996-1, Event processing as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG4/1997-1, Event processing, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG4/1996-1, Event processing passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG4/1997-1, Event processing, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG6/1997-1
Minutes SC13/TG6 March 1997

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

X11/SC15/TG17/1997-3
Minutes SC15/TG17 September 1996, Version 2

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997

X11/SC15/TG17/1997-4
Minutes SC15/TG17 March 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Aug 1997

Published:
Aug 1997