X11/SC16/TG1/1997-1
Scope of work SC16/TG1

Discussed in: SC16/TG1 Goals for Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Superseded by: X11/SC16/TG1/1998-5, Scope SC16/TG1 1998

Submitted: 21 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC15/TG4/1997-5
Minutes SC15/TG4 September 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: Keith Snell
Sponsor: Jamie L. Crumley
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 21 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC15/TG4/1997-6
Scope of work SC15/TG4 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: Keith Snell
Standing document

Submitted: 21 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/1997-28
Minutes MDC 24 September 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 21 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as read passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/TG6/1997-2
Minutes SC13/TG6 September 1997

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 24 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC15/TG17/1997-10
Minutes SC15/TG17 September 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 24 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC15/TG17/1997-9
Scope of work SC15/TG17 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Wally Fort
Standing document

Submitted: 24 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC15/1997-15
Scope of work SC15 1997

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Wally Fort
Standing document

Submitted: 27 Oct 1997
Description:
SEPT 97: accepted as standing document.
Published:
Nov 1997

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-42, Scope of Work Subcommittee 15 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document superseding X11/SC15/1996-7, Scope of Work Subcommittee 15 1995 passed by voice vote.
  

X11/SC13/TG13/1997-6
Scope of work SC13/TG13

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Standing document

Submitted: 27 Oct 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-12
User definable I/O, discussion

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 27 Oct 1997
Description:
User definable I/O discussion document.
Published:
Nov 1997

X11/1997-29
Minutes MDC 27 September 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 10 Nov 1997

Published:
Nov 1997

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 19 March 1998, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/1997-30
OMI Reverse $Q[uery], version 4

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 12 Dec 1997

Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1996-1, OMI reverse $Q[uery] as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 6 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1996-1, OMI reverse $Q[uery] passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1997-5, OMI reverse $Q[uery], Version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1997-5, OMI reverse $Q[uery], Version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1997-13
Output time out initialized

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-8, Output time out initialized, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-9, Output time out initialized, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-11, Output time out initialized, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-33, Output time out initialized, version 5

Submitted: 12 Dec 1997
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 amends (X11/SC12/TG9/98-8) and recommends acceptance as Type B. SC12 makes it so 14-0-3.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG14/1997-5
Agenda SC12/TG14 March 1998

Discussed in: SC12/TG14 xxx
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 12 Dec 1997

Published:
Feb 1998

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5
Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Subcommittee Type B

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 amended. SEPT 98: SC12 failed to elevate to type A 3-3-2.
Published:
Feb 1998
Jul 1998

Votes

• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 and X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device passed 8 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2 as amended in task group as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3 to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2 passed without dissent.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-6
Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, version 3

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998
Description:
Portable contrtolmnemonics $TEST and naked indicator. Proposed for demotion to type C. Mar 98: SC12/TG9 recommends demotion 5-0-1. SC12 demotes to type C 13-0-3. SEPT 98: SC12 rescinded 7-0-1.
Published:
Feb 1998
Aug 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8, User definable I/O handling amendment (part that relates to X11/95-95) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8, User definable I/O handling amendment passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator failed by a vote of none in favor, 12 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2 passed (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to rescind this document superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7
User definable I/O handling, version 7

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC A 4-0-2. SC12 makes it so 13-0-4.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5 as amended in task group 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3, X11/SC12/TG9/1996-5, User definable I/O handling, version 4a, X11/SC12/TG9/1996-6, User definable I/O handling, version 4b and X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5 failed by a vote of none in favor, 8 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6 and X11/SC12/TG9/1997-12, User definable I/O, discussion passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1998-4
Miscellaneous character functions, version 5

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/1998-21, Miscellaneous character functions, version 6

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12 edits and recommends elevation to MDC type A 14-0-2. MDC makes it so 22-0-3.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2b as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions and X11/SC12/TG2/1996-3, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2a passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1996-7, Miscellaneous character functions, version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document as amended to MDC for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1998-3
Name registration list, February 1998

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1999-1, Name registration list April 1999

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998

Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new error codes) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new vendors) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of package names that start with X) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (error codes M46-M60) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (vendor codes 45-47) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to approve X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 superseding X11/SC12/1995-18, Name Registration List, October 1995 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-9, Name registration list, August 1997 superseding X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 passed without dissent.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-9, Name registration list, August 1997 superseding X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/1998-2
User defined ssvns, version 8

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-7, User defined ssvns, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1998-19, User defined ssvns, version 10

Submitted: 22 Jan 1998
Description:
Proposed as replacement SC13 type A. MAR 98: SC13/TG16 recommends as a replacement type B (not A) 3-0. SC13 accepted as a replacement type A (not B) 5-2-10.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 14 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1995-8, User Definable ssvns, version 1a as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1995-5, User Definable ssvns, version 3 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 12 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 12 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1997-8, User defined ssvns, Version 7 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 11 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1997-8, User defined ssvns, Version 7 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 2 opposed and 10 abstaining.
  

X11/1998-1
CORBA September 1997 Meeting

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
OMG CORBAmed Domain Task Force meeting minutes for September 23-25, 1997.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document to Task Group 16 passed 17 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1998-2
CORBA working group December 1997

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
Handouts from M/CORBA meeting on December 2, 1997.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document to Task Group 16 passed 17 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1998-3
CORBA December 1997 Meeting

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
CORBAmed DTF meeting minutes from December 1-5, 1997 meeting. Presentations concerning M.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document to Task Group 16 passed 17 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1998-4
CORBA draft RFI January 1998

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
Draft request for information from Object Management Group on CORBA / M interoperability. Superseded by X11/SC16/98-4.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document to Task Group 16 passed 17 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/TG8/1998-1
HTML experiment

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
Experiment with different browsers for a draft proposal format.
Published:
Feb 1998

X11/SC12/1998-1
Sockets binding, version 2

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1998-14, Sockets binding, version 3

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG14 recommended elevation to MDC type A. SC12 did not object. MDC makes it so 23-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to withdraw X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding as a Type C document of Subcommittee 14 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to amend X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-5, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-4, TCP/IP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding and X11/SC14/TG6/1995-3, TCP/IP-MUMPS Binding passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-8, Sockets-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-7, TCP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-1, Socket Requirements Comments and X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-1, Socket Requirements Comments and X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document to MDC for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1998-2
POSIX thin binding, version 7

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Subcommittee Type B

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12 accepts as type B 9-2-6.
Published:
Feb 1998
Oct 1998

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG8/1994-5, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC13/TG9/1993-3, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG8/1994-7, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG8/1994-5, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 2 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-1, POSIX thin binding, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG8/1995-2, Comments on POSIX MUMPS Application Programmer Interface and X11/SC12/TG8/1995-3, POSIX Application Programmer Interface, version 4 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1997-8, POSIX thin binding, Version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1997-1, POSIX thin binding, version 5 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1997-8, POSIX thin binding, Version 6 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-1
Undefined devicekeyword, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-11, Undefined devicekeyword, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-14, Undefined devicekeyword, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1999-2, Undefined devicekeyword, version 5

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 recommends acceptance as SC12 type A 4-0-1. SC12 fails to elevate to SC type A 7-8-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1997-6, Undefined devicekeyword as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-6, Undefined devicekeyword failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 8 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-2
Device parameter issues, version 3

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Paul D. Grabscheid
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-9, Device parameter issues, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-25, Device parameter issues, version 5

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC type A 4-0-1. SC12 makes it so 12-0-5.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues (also known as X11/SC12/TG9/94-2 or X11/SC12/TG9/95-4) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues (also known as X11/SC12/TG9/94-2 or X11/SC12/TG9/95-4) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 3 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1997-5, Device parameter issues, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-5, Device Parameter Issues passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-5, Device parameter issues, version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-3
Duplicate keywords clarified

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-8, Duplicate keywords clarified, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-24, Duplicate keywords clarified, version 3

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC A with editorial changes 4-0-1. SC12 makes it so 15-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1997-4, More of the same as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-4, More of the same passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-4
O[pen] command clarification, version 3

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-7, O[pen] command clarification, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-23, O[pen] command clarification, version 5

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
OPEN command clarification (re-OPEN) MAR 98: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC A 4-0-1. SC12 makes it so 9-3-5.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1997-3, O[pen] command clarification, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-1, O[pen] command clarification passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1997-3, O[pen] command clarification, version 2 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1998-1
Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 2

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Bernard P. Schoch
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-6, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-13, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece], version 4
Superseded by: X11/1999-3, Define variable m in $P[iece], version 5

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
Define variable m in $PIECE MAR 98: accepted as type B 15-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1997-6, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece] as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1997-6, Define variable m in definition of $P[iece] passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG6/1998-1
$FD[ate] intrinsic function

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-7, $FD[ate] intrinsic function, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-14, $FD[ate] intrinsic function, version 3

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
Format date (and time) intrinsic function. MAR 98: SC13 accepted as type B 13-2-4.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG13/1998-1
Definition of reverse $Q[uery]

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1998-4, Definition of reverse $Q[uery], version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-15, Definition of reverse $Q[uery], version 3
Superseded by: X11/1999-4, Definition Reverse $Query, version 4

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC13/TG13 recommends accept as SC type B 3-0-1. SC13 makes it so 17-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG2/1997-4
Object usage, version 4

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Sponsor: Keith Snell
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG2/1998-2, Object usage, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1999-5, Object Usage, version 6

Submitted: 27 Jan 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC15/TG2 edited and recommended acceptance as SC type A without dissent. SC15 makes it so 18-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1994-29, OOP Extensions, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/1995-72, OLE/2 Objects in M[UMPS] as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-08, OOP Extensions, version 5 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-15, Object Usage, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 3 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-15, Object Usage, version 2, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-17, Object Usage, version 2 Amendment, X11/SC15/1996-19, M[UMPS] object extensions, version 2 and X11/SC15/TG2/1996-2, M[UMPS] object extensions amendment passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-15, Object Usage, version 2, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-17, Object Usage, version 2 Amendment, X11/SC15/1996-19, M[UMPS] object extensions, version 2 and X11/SC15/TG2/1996-2, M[UMPS] object extensions amendment passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-15, Object Usage, version 2, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-17, Object Usage, version 2 Amendment, X11/SC15/1996-19, M[UMPS] object extensions, version 2 and X11/SC15/TG2/1996-2, M[UMPS] object extensions amendment passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 4 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-09, Object Usage, version 1, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-15, Object Usage, version 2, X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-17, Object Usage, version 2 Amendment, X11/SC15/1996-19, M[UMPS] object extensions, version 2 and X11/SC15/TG2/1996-2, M[UMPS] object extensions amendment passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1995-72, OLE/2 Objects in M[UMPS] and X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1998-1
Pattern match string extraction, version III/1

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-8, Pattern match string extraction, version III/2
Superseded by: X11/1998-27, Pattern match string extraction, version III/3

Submitted: 5 Feb 1998
Description:
Pattern Match String Extraction version 3. Proposed as replacement SC13 type B. MAR 98: SC13/TG2 recommends acceptance as SC type B 6-0-1. SC13 accepts as a replacement and elevates to type A 13-2-4.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 27 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction and X11/SC1/1989-18, Pattern Match, Value Extraction passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-1, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG1/1994-1, Comparison of REGEX and PATMAT and X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1995-7, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 4 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1996-3, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1995-7, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1996-3, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1995-6, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1996-11, Pattern match string extraction II, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1996-3, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 3 and X11/SC13/TG2/1996-3, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 3 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1997-2, Pattern match string extraction II, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1996-11, Pattern match string extraction II, version 4 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 7 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1997-2, Pattern match string extraction II, version 5 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG4/1998-1
Event processing, version 4

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Keith Snell
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-6, Event processing, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-28, Event processing, version 6

Submitted: 5 Feb 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC15/TG4 recommended acceptance as SC15 type A 10-0-1. SC15 makes it so 18-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG4/1996-1, Event processing as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG4/1997-1, Event processing, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG4/1996-1, Event processing passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG4/1997-4, Event processing, Version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG4/1997-1, Event processing, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG4/1997-4, Event processing, Version 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG17/1998-2
Error handling corrections, version 6

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-5, Error handling corrections, version 7

Submitted: 6 Feb 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC15 elevates to type A 18-0-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/1995-64, Error Handling Corrections, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-38, Error Handling Corrections, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1995-64, Error Handling Corrections, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG17/1997-1, Error handling corrections, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1996-5, Error handling corrections, version 3 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG17/1997-5, Error handling corrections, Version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1997-1, Error handling corrections, version 4 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1997-5, Error handling corrections, Version 5 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1998-2
Cyclic redundancy check function

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1998-4, Cyclic redundancy code functions
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1998-7, Cyclic redundancy code functions, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-32, Cyclic redundancy code functions, version 3

Submitted: 6 Feb 1998
Description:
Proposed as replacement type C for $CRC, X11/SC13/93-9. MAR 98: SC13/TG2 recommends acceptance as SC type B 7-0-2. SC13 makes it so 15-2-2.
Published:
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-9, Check Sum $CRC Function, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1990-109, Check Sum $CRC Function, version 5 failed 8 in favor and 15 opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to rescind X11/SC13/1993-9, Check Sum $CRC Function, version 6 superseding X11/SC1/1990-109, Check Sum $CRC Function, version 5 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 11 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-9, Check Sum $CRC Function, version 6 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG15/1997-2
Minutes SC13/TG15 September 1997

Discussed in: SC13/TG15 Local Variable Storage
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998

Published:
Mar 1998

X11/SC15/TG2/1997-3
Scope SC15/TG2 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Sponsor: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Standing document

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998

Published:
Mar 1998

X11/SC15/TG2/1997-5
Minutes SC15/TG2 September 1997

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998

Published:
Mar 1998

X11/SC16/1997-9
Minutes SC16 Septmber 1997

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998
Description:
The March 98 publication of this document had a page missing. Republished in May 98.
Published:
Mar 1998
May 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 16 to accept this document as amended passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC16/1998-1
Adding assertions to X11.7

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: David J. Whitten
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Subcommittee Type C

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC16 accepted as type C 15-1-2.
Published:
Mar 1998

X11/SC16/1998-2
Classless objects

Discussed in: SC16 Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Sponsor: Charles M. Link III
Subcommittee Type C

Submitted: 9 Mar 1998
Description:
MAR 98: SC16 accepted as type C 16-1-1.
Published:
Mar 1998

Vote

• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 16 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 16 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG7/1998-1
Minutes SC12/TG7 March 1998

Discussed in: SC12/TG7 Security
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 1 Apr 1998

Published:
May 1998

X11/SC12/TG9/1998-10
Minutes SC12/TG9 March 1998

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 1 Apr 1998

Published:
May 1998

X11/SC12/1998-5
Minutes SC12 March 1998

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 1 Apr 1998

Published:
May 1998

Vote

• In Waltham, Massachusetts, on 26 June 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG6/1998-1
X11.1 Draft standard, version 13

Discussed in: TG6 Standards Preparation
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Subcommittee Type C

Submitted: 2 Apr 1998
Description:
March 1998 version of the millenium standard.
Published:
May 1998

X11/SC16/TG1/1998-3
Minutes SC16/TG1 March 1998

Discussed in: SC16/TG1 Goals for Object Oriented Language
Proposer: Keith Snell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Apr 1998

Published:
May 1998