X11/SC12/TG2/1993-3
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG2, January 1993

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 25 Jan 1993
Description:
FEB 93: approved with editorial corrections.
Published:
Jan 1993

X11/SC12/1993-10
Minutes Subcommittee 12, January 1993

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 25 Jan 1993

Published:
Jan 1993

X11/TG8/1993-2
Minutes MDC/TG8, June 1992 Revision

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 25 Jan 1993

Published:
Jan 1993

X11/1993-3
NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response

Discussed in: TG16 Validation Response
Proposer: Edward J. McIntosh
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded

Submitted: 28 Jan 1993
Description:
MDC response to NIST concerning validation questions from Sept 9, Oct 7, 8, and 28, 1992. FEB 93: revised and superseded by X11/93-9.
Published:
Jan 1993

X11/SC15/TG8/1992-1
First Line Format, version 1

Discussed in: SC15/TG8 First Line Format
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG8/1993-1, First Line Format, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1993-4, First Line Format, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1995-3, First Line Format, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1995-104, First Line Format, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-40, First Line Format, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-4, VA First Line Format
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-20, First line format, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-1, First line format, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-7, First line format, Version 10
Superseded by: X11/1997-25, First line format, Version 11

Submitted: 1 Feb 1993
Description:
First line format.
Published:
Jan 1993

Votes

• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed 20 in favor and 4 opposed.
  

X11/SC15/TG8/1993-1
First Line Format, version 2

Discussed in: SC15/TG8 First Line Format
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1993-4, First Line Format, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1995-3, First Line Format, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1995-104, First Line Format, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-40, First Line Format, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-4, VA First Line Format
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-20, First line format, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-1, First line format, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-7, First line format, Version 10
Superseded by: X11/1997-25, First line format, Version 11

Submitted: 1 Feb 1993
Description:
First line format. FEB 93: amended and raised to SC15 type B. Superseded by X11/SC15/TG9/93-1.
Published:
Jan 1993

Votes

• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed 20 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended (also known as X11/SC15/TG9/93-1) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG8/1992-1, First Line Format, version 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-17
$FN[umber] Function Edit Correction

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 1 Feb 1993
Description:
$FNUMBER editorial correction.
Published:
Jan 1993

X11/1993-4
Device Handling Correction, version 4

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 2 Feb 1993
Description:
Device Handling Corrections.

Votes

• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-23, Device Handling Correction, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-5
Error Processing, version 21

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Harlan M. Stenn
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 2 Feb 1993
Description:
Error Processing.

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG5/1987-1, Error Processing, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 4 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-7, Alternative Error Trapping as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-23, Alternative Error Trapping and X11/SC1/1988-44, Error Processing, version 8 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 11 in favor and 9 opposed.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1 to Task Group 5 (automatic Type C status) passed 15 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2 as divided as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12 to Task Group 5 superseding X11/SC1/1990-13, Error Processing, version 11 passed without dissent.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1 passed 12 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 17 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-37, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 10 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-38, STACK, version 5 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4 failed by a vote of 19 in favor, 17 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC1/1991-55, Error Processing, version 14 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1991-16, Error Processing, version 17B as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG1/1991-1, Error Processing, version 16 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-3, Error Processing, version 18 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1992-27, Error Processing, version 20 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/TG5/1991-1, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 5 and X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1
Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Sponsor: Carl B. Lazarus
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 2 Feb 1993
Description:
M Windowing API. Proposed as replacement SC11 type B. Jan 93: Special mailing by InterSystems. FEB 93: amended and accepted as replacement SC11 type B.

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/1992-8, Windowing Application Programmer Interface as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC11/TG4/WG2-1, User Interface Approach, X11/SC11/TG4/WG2/1991-2, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, Approaches and X11/SC11/TG4/WG2/1991-3, Window Program Example passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/1992-11, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC11/TG4/1992-8, Windowing Application Programmer Interface passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC11/TG4/1992-11, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 2, X11/SC11/1993-1, Event Processing Amendment to MWAPI, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-36, MWAPI Separate Clipboard III, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-33, MWAPI Longchars Amendment, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-35, MWAPI Replace Insert, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-5, MWAPI Amendment 1, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-6, MWAPI Editorial Corrections, version 1, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-8, MWAPI Amendment 2 and X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-9, MWAPI Amendment 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to remand this document to Task Group 4 superseding X11/SC11/TG4/1992-11, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 2, X11/SC11/1993-1, Event Processing Amendment to MWAPI, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-36, MWAPI Separate Clipboard III, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-33, MWAPI Longchars Amendment, X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-35, MWAPI Replace Insert, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-5, MWAPI Amendment 1, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-6, MWAPI Editorial Corrections, version 1, X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-8, MWAPI Amendment 2 and X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-9, MWAPI Amendment 3 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 15 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/1993-1, Event Processing Amendment to MWAPI passed 8 in favor and 6 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-36, MWAPI Separate Clipboard III passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-33, MWAPI Longchars Amendment passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-35, MWAPI Replace Insert passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 4 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-5, MWAPI Amendment 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-6, MWAPI Editorial Corrections, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-8, MWAPI Amendment 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-9, MWAPI Amendment 3 passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
  

X11/1993-6
NIST 12 February 1993 - Validation

Discussed in: TG16 Validation Response
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Administrative

Submitted: 16 Feb 1993
Description:
Validation problems 35-42 from NIST, dated February 12, 1993. FEB 93: handout at SC chairs meeting.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/1993-7
Letter from University of Missouri Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Membership

Submitted: 16 Feb 1993
Description:
Letter of intent to become MDC member, Art Smith, dated February 3, 1993.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/1993-8
MDC/MDCC-J 19 February 1993

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Yoshinori Yamashita
Sponsor: Yoshinori Yamashita
Administrative

Submitted: 22 Feb 1993
Description:
Letter from MDCC-Japan, Yoshinari Yamashita, February 19, 1993. MDCC-Japan's position statement on X11/93-3, MDC response to validation questions. Feb 93: handout.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC12/TG2/1993-5
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG2, February 1993

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Mar 1993

Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC12/TG2/1993-4
Character Set Definition Amendment

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-20, Character Set Definition, version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-11, Character Set Definition, version 9

Submitted: 2 Mar 1993
Description:
Amendments to X11/SC12/93-8. Feb 93: accepted as amendments to Character Set Profile Definition.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC12/1993-11
Character Set Definition, version 9

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-20, Character Set Definition, version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Character Set Profile Definition. Feb 93: passed as revised SC12 type B. Handout.

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-10, Character Set Definition, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 37 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5, X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6, X11/SC12/1993-1, Character Set Definition, version 7, X11/SC12/TG2/1993-4, Character Set Definition Amendment and X11/SC12/1993-1A, CHARACTER SET DEFINITION VER 7 failed 4 in favor and 7 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended, after reconsideration, as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-20
Character Set Definition, version 10

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Character Set Profile Definition. Mar 93: mail ballot to SC12. Raised to SC12 type A.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-10, Character Set Definition, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 37 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5, X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6, X11/SC12/1993-1, Character Set Definition, version 7, X11/SC12/TG2/1993-4, Character Set Definition Amendment and X11/SC12/1993-1A, CHARACTER SET DEFINITION VER 7 failed 4 in favor and 7 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-11, Character Set Definition, version 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-11, Character Set Definition, version 9 as amended, after reconsideration, as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-22
Pattern Definition, version 11

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-27, Pattern Definition, version 12
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Pattern Definition. Mar 93: To SC12 mail ballot for SC12 type A. Passed.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-7, Pattern Definition, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-2, Pattern Definition, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-12, Pattern Definition, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 passed 13 in favor and 8 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-5, Pattern Definition, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-32, Pattern Definition, version 8 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-17, Pattern Definition, version 7 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-13, Pattern Definition, version 10 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-6, Pattern Definition, version 9 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-13
Pattern Definition, version 10

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-22, Pattern Definition, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-27, Pattern Definition, version 12
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Pattern Definition. Feb 93: passed as revised SC12 type B. Handout.

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-7, Pattern Definition, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-2, Pattern Definition, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-12, Pattern Definition, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 passed 13 in favor and 8 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-5, Pattern Definition, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-32, Pattern Definition, version 8 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-17, Pattern Definition, version 7 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-6, Pattern Definition, version 9 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-9
NIST 28 February 1993 - Validation Response

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Administrative

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Revised and updated response to the interpretation requests from NIST. This document addresses all questions presented to the MDC by February 1, 1993 (#1 - #34). Feb 93: Handout. MDC voted to accept all but response to ID# 23. The final revised document will be a standing document of the MDC.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 1) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 2) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 3) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 4) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 5) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 35 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 6) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 7) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 8) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 9) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 10) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 35 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 11) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 12) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 13) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 14) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 15) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed 37 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 16) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 17) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 18) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 35 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 19) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 20) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 35 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 21) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 22) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to remand this document to MDC Task Group 17 (response 23) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed without dissent.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 24) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 25) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 26) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 27) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 28) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 29) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 30) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 31) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 32) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 33) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to approve this document (response 34) superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before the full MDC to address this document (response 23) as stated superseding X11/1993-3, NIST 28 January 1993 - Validation Response passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG6/1993-2
RMDS, version 5 Amendments

Discussed in: TG6 Standards Preparation
Proposer: John Godfrey
Sponsor: John Godfrey
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
RMDS Version 5 Amendments (to X11/TG6/93-1). Feb 93: Handout and voted. These amendments accepted for X11/TG6/93-1.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 1) passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 2) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 3) passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 4) passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 5) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 6) passed 39 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 7) passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 8) passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 9) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 10) passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 11) passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document (amendment 12) passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/TG8/1992-28
Appeals Procedure, version 5

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/1995-127, Appeals Procedure 1995, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1996-21, Appeals procedure 96
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
MDC appeals procedure. Feb 93: handout. Accepted by MDC as a Standing Document. JUNE 94: TG8 is preparing another document with just the formalization.
Published:
Apr 1993

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document superseding X11/TG8/1992-23, Appeals Procedure, version 4 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/TG8/1993-4
Interpretations Task Group

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Standing document

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Interpretations Task Group. Request for new MDC Task Group, Scope and Schedule. Feb 93: Handout. Amended in TG8. Accepted as Standing Document by MDC. TG17 formed.
Published:
Apr 1993

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/TG8/93-4.1
Subcommittee Minutes Proposal

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Administrative

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Subcommittee Minutes Proposal. Guidelines for content of minutes. Feb 93: MDC/TG8 internal document. Discussed in TG8; will not be proposed as a standing document.

X11/SC11/1993-1
Event Processing Amendment to MWAPI

Discussed in: SC11 User Interface
Proposer: John J. Althouse
Sponsor: John J. Althouse
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Event Processing Amendment to M Windowing API. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendment to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed 8 in favor and 6 opposed.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-27
MWAPI Clipboard Amendment

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Clipboard Amendment. Feb 93: Handout.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-28
MWAPI Revise Insert

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Revise INSERT, Replace TSELECT with SELECTEND. Feb 93: Handout. MAR 96: referred to SC12/TG12.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-29
MWAPI Separate Clipboard

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Separate Clipboard Amendment. Feb 93: Handout. MAR 96: referred to SC12/TG12.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-36
MWAPI Separate Clipboard III

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Separate Clipboard Amendment III. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendment to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-33
MWAPI Longchars Amendment

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
Proposed amendment for longchars. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendment to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1993-35
MWAPI Replace Insert

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Replace INSERT,TSELECT with INSELECT. FEB 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendment to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 4 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-5
MWAPI Amendment 1

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Amendment. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendments to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-6
MWAPI Editorial Corrections, version 1

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Editorial Corrections. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted as editorial corrections to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed unanimously.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-8
MWAPI Amendment 2

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Amendment 2. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendments to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-9
MWAPI Amendment 3

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing API Amendment 3. Feb 93: Handout. SC11 accepted amendments to MWAPI.

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-10
MWAPI Amendment 4

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Stephen M. Casey
Sponsor: Stephen M. Casey
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 4 Mar 1993
Description:
M Windowing Amendment 4. Feb 93: Handout. This amendment amended by X11/SC11/93-1 and accepted by SC11.
Published:
Apr 1993

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document as amended passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-12
ASCII Character Usage, version 9

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-21, ASCII Character Usage, version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-29, ASCII Character Usage, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
ASCII Character Usage. Feb 93: Handout. SC12 raised to SC type A.

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-14, ASCII Character Usage, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-3, ASCII Character Usage, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1991-4, ASCII Character Usage, version 3 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-31, ASCII Character Usage, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-16, ASCII Character Usage, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-5, ASCII Character Usage, version 8 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-21
ASCII Character Usage, version 10

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-29, ASCII Character Usage, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
ASCII Character Usage.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-14, ASCII Character Usage, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-3, ASCII Character Usage, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1991-4, ASCII Character Usage, version 3 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-31, ASCII Character Usage, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-16, ASCII Character Usage, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-12, ASCII Character Usage, version 9 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-5, ASCII Character Usage, version 8 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-23
Collating Sequences, version 11

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-30, Collating Sequences, version 12
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Alternate Collating Sequences. JUNE 93: SC12/TG4 endorsed the error codes.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-11, Collating Sequences, version 7 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-33, Collating Sequences, version 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-24, Collating Sequences, version 8 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-7, Collating Sequences, version 10 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-24, Collating Sequences, version 8 and X11/SC12/1992-33, Collating Sequences, version 9 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG4/1993-1
Report Subcommittee 12/TG4, October 1992

Discussed in: SC12/TG4 ssvn Monitoring
Proposer: Roger Partridge
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Issues raised at Task Group Meeting in October 1992. Internal TG document.

X11/SC13/1993-18
Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-38, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-60, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Unsubscripted $ORDER. Feb 93: Handout. Accepted as revised SC13 type B.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-53, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/WG4/1993-1
Report Subcommittee 13/TG2/WG4, February 1993

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: Daniel Bormann
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Report for SC13/TG2/WG4 FORMAT features and issues. Feb 93: Handout.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC13/TG13/1993-2
$Q[uery] Function Definition, version 4

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1993-4, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-48, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-2, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
$QUERY definition. Feb 93: Handout. Raised to SC13 type B.
Published:
Apr 1993

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-47, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 2 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-26, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-3, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-47, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1993-19
Subcommittee 15 Mail Ballot February 1993

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Mail Ballot Results.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC15/1993-20
Report Subcommittee 15, February 1993

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993

Published:
Apr 1993

X11/SC11/1993-2
Report Subcommittee 11, February 1993

Discussed in: SC11 User Interface
Proposer: Roger Partridge
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993

Published:
Apr 1993

X11/1993-10
NIST 25 February 1993 - FIPS Report

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: L. Arnold Johnson
Sponsor: L. Arnold Johnson
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
MUMPS Federal Information Processing Standard Program. Slides of presentation made February 25, 1993 to MDC in Portland.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/1993-11
NIST 25 February 1993 - Conformance

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: William Dashiell
Administrative

Submitted: 5 Mar 1993
Description:
Developing Conformance Test Specifications for the MUMPS Language Standard. Slides of presentation given at the meetings on February 25, 1993 in Portland.
Published:
Apr 1993

X11/1993-12
Minutes MDC, 25 February 1993

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Don E. Piccone
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 8 Mar 1993

Published:
Apr 1993

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/1993-13
Minutes MDC, 28 February 1993

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Don E. Piccone
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Mar 1993

Published:
Apr 1993

Vote

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.