X11/SC13/1993-48
$Q[uery] Function Definition, version 6

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/1994-2, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: SC13/TG13 recommends elevation to MDC type A. MDC makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-47, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 2 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-26, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-3, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-47, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1993-4, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1993-2, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 4 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1993-4, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-49
$O[rder] Function Definition, version 5

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-12, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-23, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-46, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-3, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1995-91, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 10

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: SC13/TG13 recommends elevation to SC 13 type A. SC 13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-25, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 passed without dissent.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1993-3, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-4, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 3 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1993-3, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 4 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG6/1993-2
$H[orolog] System Function II, version 1

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1993-4, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-21, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-3, $H[orolog] system function, version 2.1

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

X11/SC13/TG6/1993-4
$H[orolog] System Function II, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-21, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-3, $H[orolog] system function, version 2.1

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: TG6 recommends this as replacement type B for X11/SC13/93-31. SC13 accepts as replacement type B.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn passed 20 in favor and 9 opposed.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 19 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 38 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 4 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-1, CLOCK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 to Task Group superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2 passed 13 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-49, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/1993-31, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 5 to Task Group 6 superseding X11/SC13/1992-49, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 4 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-31, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 5 and X11/SC13/TG6/1993-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/TG6/1993-6
RMDS, version 7

Discussed in: TG6 Standards Preparation
Proposer: John Godfrey
Sponsor: John Godfrey
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
Re-organized MUMPS Draft Standard + MDC type As + Portability OCT 93: Amended and corrected and accepted.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11.1/1987-6, Device Handling, version 1.4 (also known as X11/SC1/TG3/87-2) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG5/1987-1, Error Processing, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 4 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG4/1987-2, Subtree Copying, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding MDC-32, Subtree Copying, version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 7 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1987-38, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1987-39, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-37, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 3 to Task Group 14 passed by a show of hands.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-40, R[ead] Command, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed 37 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended (first part, $TEXT extension) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended to Task Group 13 (second part, FILE command) passed 24 in favor and 16 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 22 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to rescind X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE) passed unanimously.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to rescind X11.1.1/1985-14, Device Handling, version 1 (Provisional) passed without dissent.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-59, Structured System Variables, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 5 opposed and 10 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-36, Exponentiation Operator, version 2 (also known as MDC-4) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/1988-6, Device Handling, version 1.7 (Definitely) (also known as X11.1/87-33) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11.1.1/1985-14, Device Handling, version 1 (Provisional) passed by a majority.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1988-40, R[ead] Command, version 2 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-1, External Interface as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 26 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1989-1, Networking as a Type B document of Subcommittee 7 passed by a majority.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-7, Alternative Error Trapping as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-23, Alternative Error Trapping and X11/SC1/1988-44, Error Processing, version 8 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-9, Logical OR, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 30 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1989-2, Networking in MUMPS as a Type B document of Subcommittee 7 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-1, Networking passed 9 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 failed 1 in favor and 27 opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-9, Logical OR, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1989-3, Networking Syntax in MUMPS, version ? as amended (also referenced as X11/SC7/89-3) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 7 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-2, Networking in MUMPS and MDC-19, Networking Aspects passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1989-14, Exponentiation Operator, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1988-36, Exponentiation Operator, version 2 and X11.1/1986-11, Exponentiation Operator, version 1 passed by a vote of 44 in favor, 4 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-25, ORDER Subcommittee B as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-47, $O[rder] Function Change and MDC-21, Reverse $O[rder] Function passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 9 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-26, NAME as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-35, Name Value, X11/SC1/1988-38, QN[ame] and MDC-6, Name Handling passed by a vote of 41 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-27, Device Formalization, version 1 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG3/1988-1, Device Handling Format failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 32 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-29, M[ove] Command Subcommittee B as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-45, M[ove] Command failed by a vote of 14 in favor, 23 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-31, Structured System Variables, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-1, Structured System Variables, version 3 and X11/SC1/1986-6A, Structured System Variables, version 1 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1 (also known as X11/SC1/89-15) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1989-18, X3.64 Binding, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-12, X3.64 Binding, version 1 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-34, Device Formalization, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-27, Device Formalization, version 1 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 8 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/89-33A, M[erge] Command, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-29, M[ove] Command Subcommittee B passed by a vote of 41 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-2, External Calls, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1989-1, External Interface and X11/SC1/1989-28, External Calls, version 1 failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 26 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-37, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, 9 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-38, Significant Digits, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-39, Nesting, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-42, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 and X11/SC1/1987-39, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 11 in favor and 9 opposed.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1990-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 6 (also known as X11/SC1/89-15) as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1988-37, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 3, X11/SC1/1988-58, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 5, MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1 and X11/SC1/1987-38, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 2 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to withdraw X11/SC1/1989-38, Significant Digits, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-39, Nesting, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-42, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-3, External Calls, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-30, Alternate Procedure NameSpace and X11/SC1/TG8/1989-2, External Calls, version 2 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 2 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1990-3, M[erge] Command, version 2 (also known as X11/SC1/89-52) as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding MDC-32, Subtree Copying, version 1, X11/SC1/89-33A, M[erge] Command, version 1 and X11/SC1/TG4/1987-2, Subtree Copying, version 2 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-53, Operand versus Argument, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-54, Structured System Variables, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-31, Structured System Variables, version 4 and X11/SC1/TG4/1987-1, Structured System Variables, version 1.5 passed by a vote of 35 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-55, Device Formalization, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-34, Device Formalization, version 2 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 5 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-4, Missing Parameters, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 5 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1989-26, ORDER, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1989-25, ORDER Subcommittee B passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1989-27, $NA[me] Function, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1989-26, NAME passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1 to Task Group 5 (automatic Type C status) passed 15 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1990-4, Networking Syntax in MUMPS, version 6 (also known as X11/SC7/90-1) as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-3, Networking Syntax in MUMPS, version ?, MDC-27, Networks Protocol and X11/1989-28, Networking Syntax in MUMPS, version 5 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-11, Embedded SQL as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-11, Nesting, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-39, Nesting, version 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-9, Structured System Variables, version 6 and X11.1/1987-32, Structured System Variables, version 1.3 failed by a vote of 25 in favor, 17 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-18, Device Formalization, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1989-55, Device Formalization, version 3 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 5 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-19, Operand versus Argument, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-53, Operand versus Argument, version 1 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-4, X3.64 Binding, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-18, X3.64 Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-35, Logical OR, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-9, Logical OR, version 1 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1990-5, Transaction Processing as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1990-1, External Calls, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1989-3, External Calls, version 3 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 41 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-41, Missing Parameters, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-4, Missing Parameters, version 1 passed 46 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-14, Names for Errors, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 43 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2 as divided as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-34, Significant Digits, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-38, Significant Digits, version 1 passed by a vote of 40 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG18/1990-1, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-37, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 1 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, 9 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-45, S[et] $X and $Y, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments and X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 passed by a vote of 50 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-45, S[et] $X and $Y, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments and X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 passed by a vote of 45 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-9, Structured System Variables, version 6 and X11.1/1987-32, Structured System Variables, version 1.3 failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 10 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere as divided (exponential notation) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere as divided ($FNUMBER) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-24, patcode E, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to recommend X11/SC9/1990-4, X3.64 Binding, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC9/1989-18, X3.64 Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-35, Logical OR, version 2 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1989-9, Logical OR, version 1 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-33, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 18 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-12, SQL Binding, Memo as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1990-35, X3.64 Binding, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC9/1990-4, X3.64 Binding, version 4 passed 24 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-60, $G[et] Function with Default, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-61, Operand versus Argument, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-19, Operand versus Argument, version 2 passed 24 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-64, S[et] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-52, $P[iece] Modification passed 13 in favor and 12 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-81, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-41, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 1 failed by a vote of 10 in favor, 8 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-82, Sorts After Operator, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-43, Sorts After Operator, version 1 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 14 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-83, $QL[ength] Function, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-49, $QL[ength] Function, version 1 failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/TG8/1990-2, External Calls, version 5 superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1990-1, External Calls, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-87, Missing Parameters, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-41, Missing Parameters, version 2 passed 22 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-70, Nesting, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-11, Nesting, version 2 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/1990-71, Significant Digits, version 3 superseding X11/SC1/1990-34, Significant Digits, version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-72, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG18/1990-1, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 2 failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 8 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12 to Task Group 5 superseding X11/SC1/1990-13, Error Processing, version 11 passed without dissent.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-76, Names for Errors, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-14, Names for Errors, version 2 passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1 passed 12 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-88, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-11, Transaction Processing, Amendment October 1990 as divided (3.3) passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-11, Transaction Processing, Amendment October 1990 as divided (3.1) passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 9 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-60, $G[et] Function with Default, version 2 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1 passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-87, Missing Parameters, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-41, Missing Parameters, version 2 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-72, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG18/1990-1, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 2 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG21/1990-2, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG21/1991-2, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 2 passed 33 in favor and 6 opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 17 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-33, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 1 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-88, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 7 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1 as amended by Subcommittee 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-107, Significant Digits, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-71, Significant Digits, version 3 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-110, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-42, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 1 passed 36 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.1) passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.2) passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.3) passed without dissent.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-101, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-112, Reverse Operator or Function as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11.1.1/1985-15, Reverse Operator, version 1 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 7 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-11, Extended Reference Syntax for routines, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-110, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 2 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1989-42, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 1 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-7, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-9, patcode E, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-24, patcode E, version 1 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-13, $RE[verse] Function, version 1A as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-112, Reverse Operator or Function, X11/SC1/1991-11, Reverse Operator, version 3 and X11/SC1/1991-23, $RE[verse] Function, version 1B passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-14, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-101, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 1 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, 7 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-22, Structured System Variables, version 8 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-33, External Calls, version 8 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1991-17, External Calls, version 7 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-34, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-81, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 2 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 33 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-35, Sorts After Operator, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-82, Sorts After Operator, version 2 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 8 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-36, $QL[ength] Function, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-83, $QL[ength] Function, version 2 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 32 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991, X11/SC1/TG17/1990-14, Transaction Processing, version 3 and X11/SC1/TG17/1991-1, Transaction Processing II, version 2 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-13, SQL Binding, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1990-12, SQL Binding, Memo passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-37, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 10 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-38, STACK, version 5 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4 failed by a vote of 19 in favor, 17 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-41, Names for Errors, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-98, Names for Errors, version 4 passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-44, Significant Digits, version 5 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-107, Significant Digits, version 4 passed by a vote of 40 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-45, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 4 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-72, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 3 passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-12, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 9 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/TG21/1991-2, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG21/1990-2, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 1 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 12 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-7, Pattern Definition, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-2, Pattern Definition, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/1991-5, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed 11 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2 passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 passed 32 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC1/1991-55, Error Processing, version 14 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/1991-59, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-14, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 2 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-6, Default Environment, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 14 opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-14, ASCII Character Usage, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-10, Character Set Definition, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-12, Pattern Definition, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/1991-61, Conformity Clause, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-16, Conformity Clause, version 1 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-8, S[et] Command, version 2 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC1/1991-65, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC1/1991-7, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 1 passed 23 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/1991-67, patcode E, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-9, patcode E, version 2 passed 16 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC1/1991-69, External Calls, version 9 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1989-51, External Calls, Counterproposal, version 2 and X11/SC1/1991-33, External Calls, version 8 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC1/TG21/1991-4, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/TG21/1991-2, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 6 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1991-74, Sorts After Operator, version 4 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-35, Sorts After Operator, version 3 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC1/1991-74, Sorts After Operator, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-35, Sorts After Operator, version 3 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG1/1991-1, RMDS, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of the MUMPS Development Committee passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to table X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2 superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 and X11/SC1/TG17/1991-10, Transaction Processing, III Cover-Letter passed without dissent.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 and X11/SC1/TG17/1991-10, Transaction Processing, III Cover-Letter passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC9/1991-16, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC9/1991-12, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 1 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1991-1, Functions Returning environment, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 4 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-6, Default Environment, version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1991-3, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-65, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1991-4, patcode E, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-67, patcode E, version 3 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1992-3, S[et] Command, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC13/1992-3, S[et] Command, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-9, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-60, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 1 passed 20 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-18, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-75, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 4 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 4 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-19, $QL[ength] Function, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-76, $QL[ength] Function, version 4 failed by a vote of 12 in favor, 13 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG1/1992-1, RMDS, version 2 as a Type B document of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/TG1/1991-1, RMDS, version 1 and X11/1991-45, RMDS, version 1.5 passed by a vote of 43 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1991-26, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/TG21/1991-4, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 3 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC13/1991-26, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/TG21/1991-4, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1991-14, Transaction Processing III, version 3 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1990-15, Transaction Processing Issues and X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1991-9, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-59, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 3 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-25, Character Set Definition, version 2 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-27, Pattern Definition, version 4 passed 13 in favor and 8 opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-32, $RE[verse] Function, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-58, $RE[verse] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 4 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1991-2, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-28, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 1 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/1991-1, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC9/1991-16, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 2 passed 28 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1991-16, Error Processing, version 17B as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG1/1991-1, Error Processing, version 16 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1991-4, Functions Returning environment, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-18, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 5 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-75, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 4 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1991-11, Names for Errors, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-41, Names for Errors, version 5 passed by a vote of 48 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to include X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4 in next submission for ANSI standard approval superseding X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to forward X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2 to Subcommittee 13, Task Group 2 passed 26 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1992-1, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1991-2, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-3, Character Set Definition, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-3, ASCII Character Usage, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-24, ASCII Character Usage, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1991-4, ASCII Character Usage, version 3 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-5, Pattern Definition, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-6, Pattern Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to table X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing passed 19 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 to Task Group superseding X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing passed 15 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1992-12, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1991-9, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 2 passed 48 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-9, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-7, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-10, Size Limitations for Variables, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-8, Size Limitations for Variables, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-3, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1991-4, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1992-20, $RE[verse] Function, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1991-32, $RE[verse] Function, version 3 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, 10 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG1/1992-2, RMDS, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/TG1/1992-1, RMDS, version 2 passed by a vote of 46 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-4, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 and X11/SC12/TG9/1992-8, Amendment to X11/SC12/92-4 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC15/TG3/1992-1, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 1 in priority list for next ANSI submission passed by a vote of 42 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG3/1992-1, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 44 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to include X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 in next submission for ANSI standard approval superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept X11/SC11/1992-2, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 11 superseding X11/SC9/1991-9, Should versus Must and X11/SC11/1991-1, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 3 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-3, Error Processing, version 18 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-9, Conformity Clause, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC3/1990-25, ISO/IEC/TR 10034 Conformance and X11/SC12/1991-10, Conformity Clause, version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/92-2R, Standardized Device Parameters, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1992-2, Standardized Device Parameters, version 3 passed 12 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG7/92-2R, SQL Binding, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC9/1991-13, SQL Binding, version 1 and X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 in priority list for next ANSI submission passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to include X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 in next submission for ANSI standard approval passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-11, Collating Sequences, version 7 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-13, Standardized Device Parameters, version 5 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/92-2R, Standardized Device Parameters, version 4 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1991-18, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/1991-75, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 4 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 6 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-19, $QL[ength] Function, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-76, $QL[ength] Function, version 4 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2 to Task Group 2 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-13, Standardized Device Parameters, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG9/92-2R, Standardized Device Parameters, version 4 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 7 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-14, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1992-1, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 3 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-2, Character Set Definition, version 4 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 37 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-18, Conformity Clause, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-9, Conformity Clause, version 4 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG3/1992-3, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG3/1992-1, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-9, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-10, Size Limitations for Variables, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-21, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-3, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 3 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1992-29, SQL Binding, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC9/1989-8, SQL2/SQL3 Working Draft, X11/SC4/1987-4, SQL Interfacing, X11/SC9/1990-11, Embedded SQL, X11/SC9/1991-6, SQL Memo January 1991, X11/SC1/1991-31, SQL Binding - Syntax and X11/SC15/1992-20, SQL Binding, version 4 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1992-11, Default Environment, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1992-8, Environment for Global Variables, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-37, Names for Errors, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1991-11, Names for Errors, version 6 and X11/SC15/1991-11A, ERROR NAMES VER 6 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-42, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1991-41, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-43, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1991-42, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-23, Device Handling Correction, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1992-27, Error Processing, version 20 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC1/TG5/1991-1, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 5 and X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-45, Transaction Processing III, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1992-15, Transaction Processing III, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-46, Device Handling, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-14, Device Handling, version 2 and X11/1990-30, Device Formalization, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-47, R[ead] Command, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-9, R[ead] Command, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-48, Structured System Variables, version 10 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1991-21, Structured System Variables, version 9 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-49, Operand versus Argument, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1990-59, Operand versus Argument, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-50, $G[et] Function with Default, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1991-6, $G[et] Function with Default, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-51, Exponentiation Operator, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-10, Exponentiation Operator, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-52, M[erge] Command, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1990-3, M[erge] Command, version 2 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-53, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1990-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 6 and X11/1992-35, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-54, S[et] Command, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1992-10, S[et] Command, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-55, patcode E, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1992-12, patcode E, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-56, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1992-11, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1992-30, External Calls, version 12 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1992-12, External Calls, version 11 passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1992-2, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1992-2, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 2 (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-5) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-65, S[et] $X and $Y, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1990-31, S[et] $X and $Y, version 4 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-31, ASCII Character Usage, version 6 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-16, ASCII Character Usage, version 5 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-32, Pattern Definition, version 8 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-17, Pattern Definition, version 7 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 20 January 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-33, Collating Sequences, version 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-24, Collating Sequences, version 8 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC11/1992-2, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC9/1991-9, Should versus Must and X11/SC11/1991-1, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 3 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-37, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-28, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-37, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-28, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 3 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-5, $P[rincipal], X11/1989-26, ORDER, version 5, X11/1989-27, $NA[me] Function, version 5, X11/1990-31, S[et] $X and $Y, version 4, X11/1990-51, Logical OR, version 3, X11/1990-60, Nesting, version 4, X11/SC1/1990-110, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 2, X11/1991-22, Significant Digits, version 6, X11/1991-23, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 5, X11/1991-40, Sorts After Operator, version 5, X11/1992-17, Missing Parameters, version 5, X11/1992-14, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 5, X11/1992-28, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 5, X11/1992-29, $RE[verse] Function, version 5, X11/1992-37, Names for Errors, version 7, X11/1992-42, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 5, X11/1992-43, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 5, X11/1992-45, Transaction Processing III, version 5, X11/1992-46, Device Handling, version 3, X11/1992-47, R[ead] Command, version 4, X11/1992-48, Structured System Variables, version 10, X11/1992-49, Operand versus Argument, version 5, X11/1992-50, $G[et] Function with Default, version 4, X11/1992-51, Exponentiation Operator, version 5, X11/1992-52, M[erge] Command, version 3, X11/1992-53, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 7, X11/1992-54, S[et] Command, version 6, X11/1992-55, patcode E, version 6, X11/1992-56, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 5, X11/SC15/1992-30, External Calls, version 12, X11/1992-65, S[et] $X and $Y, version 5, X11/1992-73, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 6, X11/1992-93, Functions Returning environment, version 5, X11/1992-94, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 5, X11/TG6/1992-3, RMDS, version 4, X11/1992-84, SQL Binding, version 6, X11/1992-85, Standardized Device Parameters, version 6, X11/1992-86, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 5, X11/1992-87, Conformity Clause, version 6, X11/SC15/1993-7, L[ock] Command Correction, X11/1993-1, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 6, X11/1993-4, Device Handling Correction, version 4 and X11/1993-5, Error Processing, version 21 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5 ($FNUMBER amendment) superseding X11/1989-5, $P[rincipal], X11/1989-26, ORDER, version 5, X11/1989-27, $NA[me] Function, version 5, X11/1990-31, S[et] $X and $Y, version 4, X11/1990-51, Logical OR, version 3, X11/1990-60, Nesting, version 4, X11/SC1/1990-110, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 2, X11/1991-22, Significant Digits, version 6, X11/1991-23, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 5, X11/1991-40, Sorts After Operator, version 5, X11/1992-17, Missing Parameters, version 5, X11/1992-14, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 5, X11/1992-28, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 5, X11/1992-29, $RE[verse] Function, version 5, X11/1992-37, Names for Errors, version 7, X11/1992-42, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 5, X11/1992-43, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 5, X11/1992-45, Transaction Processing III, version 5, X11/1992-46, Device Handling, version 3, X11/1992-47, R[ead] Command, version 4, X11/1992-48, Structured System Variables, version 10, X11/1992-49, Operand versus Argument, version 5, X11/1992-50, $G[et] Function with Default, version 4, X11/1992-51, Exponentiation Operator, version 5, X11/1992-52, M[erge] Command, version 3, X11/1992-53, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 7, X11/1992-54, S[et] Command, version 6, X11/1992-55, patcode E, version 6, X11/1992-56, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 5, X11/SC15/1992-30, External Calls, version 12, X11/1992-65, S[et] $X and $Y, version 5, X11/1992-73, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 6, X11/1992-93, Functions Returning environment, version 5, X11/1992-94, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 5, X11/TG6/1992-3, RMDS, version 4, X11/1992-84, SQL Binding, version 6, X11/1992-85, Standardized Device Parameters, version 6, X11/1992-86, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 5, X11/1992-87, Conformity Clause, version 6, X11/SC15/1993-7, L[ock] Command Correction, X11/1993-1, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 6, X11/1993-4, Device Handling Correction, version 4 and X11/1993-5, Error Processing, version 21 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5 (Numbers of subscripts and nodes amendment) superseding X11/1989-5, $P[rincipal], X11/1989-26, ORDER, version 5, X11/1989-27, $NA[me] Function, version 5, X11/1990-31, S[et] $X and $Y, version 4, X11/1990-51, Logical OR, version 3, X11/1990-60, Nesting, version 4, X11/SC1/1990-110, Q[uit] Command Indirection, version 2, X11/1991-22, Significant Digits, version 6, X11/1991-23, Change Limitations on Subscripts, version 5, X11/1991-40, Sorts After Operator, version 5, X11/1992-17, Missing Parameters, version 5, X11/1992-14, Remove $N[ext] Function from MUMPS Language, version 5, X11/1992-28, $SY[ystem] Intrinsic Variable, version 5, X11/1992-29, $RE[verse] Function, version 5, X11/1992-37, Names for Errors, version 7, X11/1992-42, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 5, X11/1992-43, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 5, X11/1992-45, Transaction Processing III, version 5, X11/1992-46, Device Handling, version 3, X11/1992-47, R[ead] Command, version 4, X11/1992-48, Structured System Variables, version 10, X11/1992-49, Operand versus Argument, version 5, X11/1992-50, $G[et] Function with Default, version 4, X11/1992-51, Exponentiation Operator, version 5, X11/1992-52, M[erge] Command, version 3, X11/1992-53, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 7, X11/1992-54, S[et] Command, version 6, X11/1992-55, patcode E, version 6, X11/1992-56, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 5, X11/SC15/1992-30, External Calls, version 12, X11/1992-65, S[et] $X and $Y, version 5, X11/1992-73, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 6, X11/1992-93, Functions Returning environment, version 5, X11/1992-94, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 5, X11/TG6/1992-3, RMDS, version 4, X11/1992-84, SQL Binding, version 6, X11/1992-85, Standardized Device Parameters, version 6, X11/1992-86, S[et] $D[evice] and $K[ey], version 5, X11/1992-87, Conformity Clause, version 6, X11/SC15/1993-7, L[ock] Command Correction, X11/1993-1, $QS[ubscript] Function, version 6, X11/1993-4, Device Handling Correction, version 4 and X11/1993-5, Error Processing, version 21 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 3 opposed and 15 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1993-14, $QL[ength] Function, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1991-19, $QL[ength] Function, version 5 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1993-2, Default Environment, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/1992-11, Default Environment, version 5 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1993-2, Default Environment, version 6 as amended for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/1992-11, Default Environment, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1993-3, Environment for Global Variables, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/1992-8, Environment for Global Variables, version 2 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1993-3, Environment for Global Variables, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/1992-8, Environment for Global Variables, version 2 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-9, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG3/1992-3, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 2 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1993-1, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1992-2, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 2 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-7, Collating Sequences, version 10 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-24, Collating Sequences, version 8 and X11/SC12/1992-33, Collating Sequences, version 9 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-15, Character Set Definition, version 5, X11/SC12/1992-30, Character Set Definition, version 6, X11/SC12/1993-1, Character Set Definition, version 7, X11/SC12/TG2/1993-4, Character Set Definition Amendment and X11/SC12/1993-1A, CHARACTER SET DEFINITION VER 7 failed 4 in favor and 7 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-11, Character Set Definition, version 9 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-11, Character Set Definition, version 9 as amended, after reconsideration, as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-8, Character Set Definition, version 8 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-13, Pattern Definition, version 10 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-6, Pattern Definition, version 9 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 1) passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 2) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 3) passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 4) passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 5) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 6) passed 39 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 7) passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 8) passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 9) passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 10) passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 11) passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments (amendment 12) passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-12, ASCII Character Usage, version 9 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-5, ASCII Character Usage, version 8 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC15/1993-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 5 in X11.1 Canvass document superseding X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 passed by a vote of 40 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC15/1993-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 5 in X11.1 Canvass document superseding X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1992-81, Character Set Definition Comments and X11/SC12/1993-20, Character Set Definition, version 10 passed by a vote of 43 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1993-27, Pattern Definition, version 12 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1993-22, Pattern Definition, version 11 passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1993-29, ASCII Character Usage, version 11 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1993-21, ASCII Character Usage, version 10 passed by a vote of 44 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1993-30, Collating Sequences, version 12 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1993-23, Collating Sequences, version 11 passed by a vote of 43 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5, X11/SC15/1993-9, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 3, X11/SC15/TG10/1993-1, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 3, X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments, X11/1993-20, Default Environment, version 7, X11/1993-21, Environment for Global Variables, version 4, X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11, X11/SC12/1993-27, Pattern Definition, version 12, X11/SC12/1993-29, ASCII Character Usage, version 11, X11/SC12/1993-30, Collating Sequences, version 12, X11/SC13/TG13/1993-5, $O[rder] Function on ssvns and X11/1993-18, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 5 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to amend X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6 as indicated superseding X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5, X11/SC15/1993-9, Transaction Processing Clarification, version 3, X11/SC15/TG10/1993-1, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 3, X11/TG6/1993-2, RMDS, version 5 Amendments, X11/1993-20, Default Environment, version 7, X11/1993-21, Environment for Global Variables, version 4, X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11, X11/SC12/1993-27, Pattern Definition, version 12, X11/SC12/1993-29, ASCII Character Usage, version 11, X11/SC12/1993-30, Collating Sequences, version 12, X11/SC13/TG13/1993-5, $O[rder] Function on ssvns and X11/1993-18, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 5 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended superseding X11/1988-14, Routine Identification Convention, X11/1988-15, Transfer of Routines and Global Variables, version 3, X11/1990-61, X3.64 Binding, version 6, X11/SC9/1991-10, No English Text in the Value of $D[evice], X11/SC11/1992-2, X3.64 Binding Revision, version 4, X11/1993-19, $QL[ength] Function, version 7, X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6, X11/TG6/1993-4, RMDS, version 6 Amendments, X11/1993-40, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 6 and X11/1993-41, Size Limitations for Variables, version 6 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-1
M[UMPS] OOP Specification, version 1

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
A first try at an M OOP specification.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-2
M[UMPS] OOP Specification, version 2

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
A second try at an M OOP specification.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-3
M[UMPS] OOP Code

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993
Description:
Sample M OOP code.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-4
M[UMPS] OOP Document Register

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-6
Notes Subcommittee 15/TG2/WG1 2 July 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-7
Declaring and Distinguishing Variables

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Jerry E. Goodnough
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-8
CLASS CLASS

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Jerry E. Goodnough
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-9
Accessing Public Members of Objects

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Jerry E. Goodnough
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-10
Possible Elements Variable DEF

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Jerry E. Goodnough
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-11
Notes Subcommittee 15/TG2/WG1 30 July 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-12
Comments and Suggestions

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-13
Notes Subcommittee 15/TG2/WG1 13 August 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-14
Notes Subcommittee 15/TG2/WG1 27 August 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-15
Comments 6 September 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Administrative

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1993-16
Notes Subcommittee 15/TG2/WG1 10 September 1993

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 13 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/1993-37
Ambiguities in M[UMPS] ANSI Standard

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Administrative

Submitted: 14 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC13/1993-52
Grouped Data - Synthesis and Extraction, version 2

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-14, Grouped Data - Synthesis and Extraction, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1997-2, Data record functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-2, Data record functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-3, Data record functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-4, Data record functions, version 7

Submitted: 14 Sep 1993
Description:
Grouped data - synthesis and extraction. OCT 93: Discussed in SC13/TG3 and accepted as type C.
Published:
Sep 1993

Vote

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand this document to Task Group (automatic Type C status) superseding X11/SC13/1993-27, Grouped Data - Synthesis and Extraction, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1993-10
Block Structuring, version 4

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1994-1, Block Structuring, version 5

Submitted: 14 Sep 1993
Description:
Block structuring and command scoping using {}.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/1993-38
Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 8

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Naked indicator after $QUERY.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1990-79, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 1 to Task Group 24 (automatic Type C status) passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-24, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-79, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 4 opposed and 12 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-8, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 6 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-15, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 5 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1993-28, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1993-8, Naked Reference and $Q[uery] Function, version 6 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-40
Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 6

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Portable size limit of routines.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-9, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-7, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-9, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC15/1993-23, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 5 in X11.1 Canvass document superseding X11/SC15/1993-1, Portability Size Limit for Routines, version 4 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-41
Size Limitations for Variables, version 6

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Portable size limit of local variables.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-10, Size Limitations for Variables, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-8, Size Limitations for Variables, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-10, Size Limitations for Variables, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 3 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/1993-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 5 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 passed by a vote of 40 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before the full MDC to include X11/SC15/1993-24, Size Limitations for Variables, version 5 in X11.1 Canvass document superseding X11/SC15/1993-2, Size Limitations for Variables, version 4 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1993-38
Lower Case Characters in names, version 6

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-7, Lower Case Characters in names, version 8

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Lower-case characters in names. OCT 93: SC15 discussed and voted not to present to full MDC. FEB 94: alternative proposal is X11/SC15/94-5, but it failed to replace this document. Jan 95: SC15 failed to demote to SC15 type B. JUN 95: this is waiting for other documents, in particular, portable length limit of names. OCT 95: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1993
May 1994
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-11, Lower Case Characters in names, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-9, Lower Case Characters in names, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 6 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-3, Lower Case Characters in names, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-25, Lower Case Characters in names, version 3 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-25, Lower Case Characters in names, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-3, Lower Case Characters in names, version 4 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 4 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remove this document from consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/1993-25, Lower Case Characters in names, version 5 passed 12 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-25, Lower Case Characters in names, version 5 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-25, Lower Case Characters in names, version 5 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-53
Library Function PRODUCE, version 10

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-4, Library Function PRODUCE, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-17, Library Function PRODUCE, version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-29, Library Function PRODUCE, version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-41, Library Function PRODUCE, version 14
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-4, Library Function PRODUCE, version 15
Superseded by: X11/1995-111, Library Function PRODUCE, version 16

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
PRODUCE library function OCT 93: SC13 decided not to advance to MDC at this meeting.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-17, $TR[anslate] Function, Variable-Length PRODUCE, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-3, $TR[anslate] Function, Variable-Length PRODUCE, version 1 failed 3 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-13, Library Function PRODUCE, version 6 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-14, Library Function PRODUCE, version 5 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 6 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-37, Library Function PRODUCE, version 7 (replaced by hand-out X11/SC13/92-63) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-13, Library Function PRODUCE, version 6 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-5, Library Function PRODUCE, version 8 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-37, Library Function PRODUCE, version 7 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-33, Library Function PRODUCE, version 9 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1990-47, $TR[anslate] Function with 4 Parameters and X11/SC13/1993-5, Library Function PRODUCE, version 8 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to withhold this document from consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC13/1993-33, Library Function PRODUCE, version 9 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 2 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-54
Library Function REPLACE, version 10

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-3, Library Function REPLACE, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-18, Library Function REPLACE, version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-30, Library Function REPLACE, version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-42, Library Function REPLACE, version 14
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-5, Library Function REPLACE, version 15
Superseded by: X11/1995-112, Library Function REPLACE, version 16

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
REPLACE library function OCT 93: SC13 decided not to advance to MDC at this meeting.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-20, Natural Language Handling, version 2 to Task Group superseding X11/SC1/1988-6, Natural Language Handling, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-18, $TR[anslate] Function, Variable LNGTH-REPLACE, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-2, $TR[anslate] Function, Variable-Length REPLACE, version 1 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC8/1991-10, Library Function REPLACE, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1982-1, REPLACE Function, X11/SC8/1989-18, $TR[anslate] Function, Variable LNGTH-REPLACE, version 2 and X11/SC8/1990-4, Library Function REPLACE, version 3 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-14, Library Function REPLACE, version 6 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-5, Library Function REPLACE, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 6 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-38, Library Function REPLACE, version 7 (replaced by hand-out X11/SC13/92-64) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-14, Library Function REPLACE, version 6 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-34, Library Function REPLACE, version 9 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-6, Library Function REPLACE, version 8 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to withhold this document from consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC13/1993-34, Library Function REPLACE, version 9 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 2 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-55
Portability Limit String Length, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-5, Portability Limit String Length, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1994-28, Portability Limit String Length, version 5

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Portability limit of string length OCT 93: discussed in TG2.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-11, Portability Limit String Length, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1992-3, String and Line Length Increase passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-30, Portability Limit String Length, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-11, Portability Limit String Length, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-56
General Mathematical Library Functions, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-7, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-25, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-37, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1995-11, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 7

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Library functions - general mathematics. Proposed as replacement type B. OCT 93: Discussed in TG5, recommended for replacement type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (ATAN, ATANH, COS, COSH, LOG, SIN, SINH and SQR; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (DINT, SLP and ZERO; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-5, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 1 and X11/SC13/1992-40, General Mathematical Library Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-57
Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-8, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-26, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-40, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1995-14, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 7

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Function library - complex mathematics. Proposed as replacement type B. OCT 93: TG5 recommended as replacement type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-6, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-25, Mathematical Functions B passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-6, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 1 and X11/SC13/1992-41, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-58
Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-9, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-27, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-38, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1995-12, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 7

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Library functions - Trigonometry. Proposed as replacement type B. OCT 93: TG5 recommended as replacement type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (ATAN, ATANH, COS, COSH, LOG, SIN, SINH and SQR; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (DINT, SLP and ZERO; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-7, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 1 and X11/SC13/1992-42, Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-59
Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-10, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-28, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-39, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1995-13, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 7

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Library functions - hyperbolic trigonometry. Proposed as a replacement type B. OCT 93: TG5 recommended as replacement type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (ATAN, ATANH, COS, COSH, LOG, SIN, SINH and SQR; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as divided (DINT, SLP and ZERO; also known as X11/SC8/91-6) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-24, Mathematical Functions A as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC8/1989-6, Mathematical Function ATAN, X11/SC8/1989-7, Mathematical Function ATANH, X11/SC8/1989-8, Mathematical Function COS, X11/SC8/1989-9, Mathematical Function COSH, X11/SC8/1989-11, Mathematical Function LOG, X11/SC8/1989-12, Mathematical Function SIN, X11/SC8/1989-13, Mathematical Function SINH and X11/SC8/1989-15, Mathematical Function SQR passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-8, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 1 and X11/SC13/1992-43, Hyperbolic Trigonometric Mathematical Library Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-39
Sequential Character Streams, version 1

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-2, Sequential Character Streams, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-6, Sequential Character Streams, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-12, Sequential Character Streams, version 4

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Sequential Character Streams. Proposed as replacement for X11/SC9/91-8 type B. OCT 93: discussed and edited in TG5.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC12/1993-40
Magnetic Tape Handling, version 1

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-3, Magnetic Tape Handling, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-7, Magnetic Tape Handling, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-13, Magnetic Tape Handling, version 4

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Magnetic tape handling. Proposed as replacement for X11/SC9/90-9 type B.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC13/TG5/1993-4
Backward Compatible Numbers

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-11, Strange Numbers
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-31, Non-Numeric Values, version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-43, Non-Numeric Values, version 2

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Numbers. Or: How to deal with 'strange' values in a backward compatible way. Task group discussion document. OCT 93: discussed in TG5.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/TG17/1993-2
Parameter Passing Clarification, version 4

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1995-94, Parameter Passing Clarification, version 5

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Parameter passing clarification. OCT 93: amended and raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-18, Parameter Passing Clarification, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-8, Parameter Passing Clarification, version 2 (also known as X11/SC15/93-17) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-18, Parameter Passing Clarification, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/TG17/1993-1, Parameter Passing Clarification, version 3 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC14/1993-13
Agenda Subcommittee 14, October 1993

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993

Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC14/1993-14
Device Environment, version 2

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG3/1994-3, Device Environment, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG3/1995-1, Device Environment, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1995-4, Device Environment, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1995-10, Device Environment, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1996-51, Device environment, version 7

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: MDC discussed but motion was withdrawn. FEB 94: TG3 recommends demotion to SC type B during discussion. SC14 demotes to SC type B.
Published:
Sep 1993
Jan 1994

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-2, Device Space, Networking, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-13, Device Space, Networking, version 2 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-2, Device Space, Networking, version 3 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1993-5
OMI WRITE, version 3

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: John J. Althouse
Sponsor: Peter Cudhea
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG4/1994-2, OMI WRITE, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG4/1994-6, OMI WRITE, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1995-5, OMI WRITE, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1995-93, OMI WRITE, version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
OMI WRITE. Proposed as replacement type B. OCT 93: elevated to SC14 type B.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to remand X11/SC14/TG2/1992-3, Networked Device Operations to Task Group 4 (automatic Type C status) passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1993-2, OMI WRITE, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG2/1992-3, Networked Device Operations, X11/SC14/TG4/1993-2, OMI WRITE, version 1 and X11/SC14/TG4/1993-4, OMI WRITE, version 2 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1993-60
Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 8

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
Unsubscripted $ORDER.
Published:
Sep 1993

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-53, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-18, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  

X11/1993-42
RMDS Review Questions, version 1

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Joop S. Duisterhout
Sponsor: Frans S.C. Witte
Superseded by: X11/TG17/1993-3, RMDS Review Questions, version 2

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
30 August 1993 letter from MDCC-E to "Interpretation Review Board, MDC Secretariat" with problems concerning interpretation of the standard.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/1993-43
Letter from BSB Software Büro Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Stefan R.B. Otto
Sponsor: Don E. Piccone
Membership

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
1 September 93 letter requesting membership in MDC from W. Polzer.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/1993-44
Letter from Bradfield Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Don E. Piccone
Membership

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
7 September 93 letter requesting membership.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/SC15/1993-39
Spaces at End of Line, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Frans S.C. Witte
Sponsor: Frans S.C. Witte
Superseded by: X11/1995-96, Spaces at End of Line, version 3

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: SC15/TG9 recommends elevation to SC 15 type A. SC15 remanded to TG. SC15 passed to SC15 type A. FEB 94: raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1993
Jan 1994

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-7, EXECUTE Clarification, version 1 Command Execution as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1989-7, EXECUTE Interpretation passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/92-31.1, EXECUTE Clarification, version 2 or (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-6) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-7, EXECUTE Clarification, version 1 Command Execution failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC15/1993-15, EXECUTE Clarification, version 3 X[ecute] Command ? passed 14 in favor and 9 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-15, EXECUTE Clarification, version 3 X[ecute] Command ? passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1993-41
R[ead] from Null Device

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Frans S.C. Witte
Sponsor: Frans S.C. Witte
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Submitted: 16 Sep 1993
Description:
OCT 93: TG9 recommends amending X11/SC12/93-32 with this and approving as SC type B. SC12 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1993

Vote

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-45
NIST 13 September 1993 - Validation Response

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: Jamie L. Crumley
Sponsor: Jamie L. Crumley
Administrative

Submitted: 20 Sep 1993
Description:
MDC responses to Validation problem statements 35 through 42. Dated 13 September 1993.
Published:
Sep 1993

X11/1993-46
Normalize Definition of TS[tart] Command, version 1

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Mo Cheng
Sponsor: Mo Cheng
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1994-1, Normalize Definition of TS[tart] Command, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1994-27, Normalize Definition of TS[tart] Command, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-5, Normalize Definition of TS[tart] Command, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-65, Normalize definition TSTART, version 5

Submitted: 1 Nov 1993
Description:
OCT 93: handout. SC15 accepted as type C.
Published:
Nov 1993

Vote

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/1993-47
Issues with RMDS, version 6

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 1 Nov 1993
Description:
OCT 93: Issues with RMDS Version 6 (X11/TG6/93-3). Handout.
Published:
Nov 1993