X11/1995-98
Letter from Henry G. Heffernan 15 June 1995 Summary

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995
Description:
Letter from HH 6-15-95. This is the preamble and summary. The cover is X11/95-97.
Published:
Jul 1995

X11/1995-99
Response to Henry G. Heffernan Letter of 15 June 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995
Description:
To HH from EdM, 6-23-95. Short acknowledgment.
Published:
Jul 1995

X11/SC15/1995-27
Minutes Subcommittee 15, Jaunary 1995 Revised

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995

Published:
Jul 1995

X11/SC15/1995-28
Minutes Subcommittee 15, June 1995

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995

Published:
Jul 1995

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as corrected passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG8/1995-9
Time Limits

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Discussion

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995
Description:
Proposed Constitutional Amendment regarding MDC Time Limits. SEPT 95: MDCC-E does not support this proposal. OCT 95: TG8 discussed and will produce a new document. SEPT 97: referred to TG8.
Published:
Jul 1995

X11/TG17/1995-7
String Length Limit Exceeded, version 1

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1995-136, String Length Limit Exceeded, version 2

Submitted: 30 Jun 1995
Description:
Clarification. July 95: Proposed that TG17 accept with SC type A status. SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports. OCT 95: MDC accepts as Interpretation.
Published:
Jul 1995

Vote

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as an interpretation passed by a vote of 27 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1995-14
Name Registration List, June 1995

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-18, Name Registration List, October 1995
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-2, Name registration list, January 1997
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-9, Name registration list, August 1997
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-3, Name registration list, February 1998
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1999-1, Name registration list April 1999

Submitted: 3 Jul 1995

Published:
Jul 1995

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new error codes) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of new vendors) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to endorse X11/SC12/1993-25, Name Registration List, March 1993 (list of package names that start with X) superseding X11/SC12/1992-38, Name Registration List, December 1992 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (error codes M46-M60) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-14, Name Registration List, December 1994 (vendor codes 45-47) superseding X11/SC12/1994-11, Name Registration List, July 1994 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-106
If-Then-Else

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Michael Bundy
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-17, THEN command, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1997-2, THEN command, version 3

Submitted: 6 Jul 1995
Description:
EMAIL messages from MBundy in June 95. SEPT 95: MDCC-E does not support. OCT 95: Accepted as type C by SC15/TG17. Sponsor being sought.
Published:
Jul 1995
Apr 1996

X11/1995-102
X11.4-1995 ANSI Approval

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 21 Jul 1995
Description:
ANSI notification of approval of standard ANSI/MDC X11.4-1995, MUMPS - X Window System Binding, June 12, 1995.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC15/1995-29
linebody Syntax, version 1A

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Liam McSwiney
Sponsor: Lee J. Hirz
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-33, linebody Syntax, version 1B

Submitted: 21 Jul 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-106
Appeal Henry G. Heffernan 14 August 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
Original HH appeal on August 14, 1995. Appeal on the procedural inaction of the MDC in not completing the development of an ANSI approved appeals procedure, and on not incorporating the ANSI-accredited canvass ballot process into the standards development process of the MDC.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-107
Appeal Henry G. Heffernan 14 August 1995 (ANSI Letter)

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
Letter from HH to ANSI on August 14, 1995 concerning his appeal to the MDC on the same date.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/TG17/1995-8
The meaning of "Backward Compatible" and "Reserved", version 1

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1995-137, The meaning of "Backward Compatible" and "Reserved", version 2
Superseded by: X11/TG17/1998-7, Backward compatible and reserved, version 2A

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: TG17 amended. MDC accepted as Interpretation.
Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as an interpretation passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC14/1995-8
Agenda Subcommittee 14, October 1995

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC14/1995-9
Bylaws Subcommittee 14, version 1

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1995-138, Bylaws Subcommittee 14, version 2

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: accepted by SC 14. Amended and accepted by MDC.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1995-7
OMI JOB, version 3

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1995-13, OMI JOB, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-30, OMI job, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC14/TG4 recommends elevation to SC A. SC14 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1994-7, OMI JOB, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-2, OMI JOB, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1994-7, OMI JOB, version 1 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-2, OMI JOB, version 2 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1995-8
OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 2

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG4/1995-12, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1996-1, OMI extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-69, OMI extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
AUG 95: proposed as replacement type B. OCT 95: SC14/TG4 recommends acceptance as SC B. SC14 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-3, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 5 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-3, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1995-9
OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 2

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1995-14, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-31, OMI multiple-transaction message, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC14/TG4 recommends elevation to SC A. SC14 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-4, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-4, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 1 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1995-10
OMI International, version 1

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: George K. Yenoki
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG4/1995-13, OMI International, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1996-2, OMI international, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-70, OMI international, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC14/TG4 recommends elevation to SC B. SC14 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-108
Add Postcondition to Q[uit] Command

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Bo Midberg
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
Add postcondition to the QUIT commands argument. MAR 96: SC15/TG17 recommends defeat as type C. SC15 defeated.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-109
Permitting G[oto] out of Dot-Structure

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Bo Midberg
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 17 Aug 1995
Description:
Permitting GOTO out of dotstructured code blocks. MAR 96: SC15/TG17 accepts as type C. SC15 defeated.
Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 18 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-26
Q[uit] Command with Argument in Context of F[or] Command, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Daniel Bormann
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-1, Q[uit] Command with Argument in Context of F[or] Command, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-49, QUIT with argument in FOR, version 4

Submitted: 22 Aug 1995
Description:
QUIT with Argument in FOR command. OCT 95: SC15 raised to SC type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-22, Q[uit] Command with Argument in Context of F[or] Command, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-22, Q[uit] Command with Argument in Context of F[or] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-110
Appeal Response 14 August 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 31 Aug 1995
Description:
Response from MDC, Ed de Moel, August 28, 1995, to HH Appeal dated August 14, 1995 (X11/95-106).
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-115
Appeals Hearing Report 25 July 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Aug 1995
Description:
Report of the 25 July 1995 MDC Appeals Hearing (by teleconference).
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/TG5/1995-8
XOR Operator, version 4

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Edward A. Malin
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-2, XOR Operator, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1996-27, XOR Operator, version 6

Submitted: 31 Aug 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13 elevated to SC type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG5/1993-3, Exclusive OR, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1990-49, Exclusive OR passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG5/1994-1, Exclusive OR, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG5/1993-3, Exclusive OR, version 1 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 10 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-12, XOR Operator, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG5/1994-1, Exclusive OR, version 2 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-12, XOR Operator, version 3 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-113
Agenda MDC 1995 October

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Aug 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/TG5/1995-7
Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 3

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-1, Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-26, Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 5

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13 elevated to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-11, Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-1, Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-11, Mathematical Library Functions for Sparse Matrices, version 2 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-90
Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 6

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/1995-132, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 7

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG9 made editorial corrections. MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-14, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1993-5, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 2 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC15/1992-14, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1994-4, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-5, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 2 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1994-7, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1994-4, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 3 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-1, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 5 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-5, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 2, X11/SC15/TG9/1994-4, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 3 and X11/SC15/TG9/1994-7, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 4 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-1, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 5 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A as amended superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-1, Parameter Passing to a Routine, version 5 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/1995-21
$H[orolog] System Function II, version 7

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-3, $H[orolog] system function, version 2.1

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: proposed as replacement SC13 type A. OCT 95: SC13 amended and accepted as SC type A. MDC FAILED to elevate to type A. SEPT 97: MDC failed to elevate to type A 9-10-7. MAR 98: SC13 reaffirmed as SC type A 9-5-5.
Published:
Sep 1995
Aug 1997
Feb 1998

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-46, $H[orolog] Function, version 1 to Task Group passed by a show of hands.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-46, $H[orolog] Function, version 1 to Task Group passed by a majority.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn passed 20 in favor and 9 opposed.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 19 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 38 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 4 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-1, CLOCK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC1/1991-18, $H[orolog] System Function, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 to Task Group superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2 passed 13 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-21, $H[orolog] System Function, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1989-44, $H[orolog] Function, version 2, X11/SC1/1990-39, $H[orolog] Function, Interpretation, X11/SC13/1991-15, $H[orolog] System Function, version 3 and X11/SC13/1992-2, $H[orolog] System Function - Amendment passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to remove X11/SC13/1992-21, $H[orolog] System Function, version 4 from priority list superseding X11/SC1/1989-44, $H[orolog] Function, version 2, X11/SC1/1990-39, $H[orolog] Function, Interpretation, X11/SC13/1991-15, $H[orolog] System Function, version 3 and X11/SC13/1992-2, $H[orolog] System Function - Amendment passed 38 in favor and 6 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-49, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/1993-31, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 5 to Task Group 6 superseding X11/SC13/1992-49, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 4 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG6/1993-4, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-31, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 5 and X11/SC13/TG6/1993-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-60, $H[orolog] System Function, version 5 and X11/SC13/TG6/1993-4, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC8/TG4/1990-1, Date and Time and X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 11 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC8/TG4/1990-1, Date and Time and X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 10 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC8/TG4/1990-1, Date and Time and X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 5 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/TG8/1995-10
Proposal Format Impact

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Discussion

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
Proposal format impact statement. Sept 95: proposed as modification to X11/TG8/93-11, Proposal Format standing document. OCT 95: TG8 discussed and postponed indefinitely. SEPT 97: referred to TG8.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-6
Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1996-3, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1996-11, Pattern match string extraction II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-2, Pattern match string extraction II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1998-1, Pattern match string extraction, version III/1
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-8, Pattern match string extraction, version III/2
Superseded by: X11/1998-27, Pattern match string extraction, version III/3

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
Pattern Match String Extraction, version 2. OCT 95: SC13/TG2 failed to recommend elevation to SC A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 27 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction and X11/SC1/1989-18, Pattern Match, Value Extraction passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-1, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG1/1994-1, Comparison of REGEX and PATMAT and X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-7
Pattern Match Algorithm, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1996-3, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1996-11, Pattern match string extraction II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-2, Pattern match string extraction II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1998-1, Pattern match string extraction, version III/1
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-8, Pattern match string extraction, version III/2
Superseded by: X11/1998-27, Pattern match string extraction, version III/3

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13/TG2 recommends elevation to SC A. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 4 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-30
Add J[ob] Command to Routine Execution, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-9, Add J[ob] Command to Routine Execution, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-58, Add JOB command to routine execution description, version 4

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15 raised to SC type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-25, Add J[ob] Command to Routine Execution, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-25, Add J[ob] Command to Routine Execution, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-31
Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-8, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-57, GOTO rewording, version 4

Submitted: 1 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15 raised to SC type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-28, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-16, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to rescind X11/SC15/1992-28, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 superseding X11/SC15/1992-16, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-23, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-28, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-23, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1995-9
mnemonicspec Clean-Up, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-2, mnemonicspec Clean-Up, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-15, Mnemonicspec cleanup, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1997-10, mnemonicspec cleanup, Version 5

Submitted: 5 Sep 1995
Description:
Oct 95: proposed as replacement type B. SC12 accepts as replacement SC B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-6, mnemonicspec Clean-Up, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-6, mnemonicspec Clean-Up, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-104
First Line Format, version 5

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-40, First Line Format, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-4, VA First Line Format
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-20, First line format, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-1, First line format, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-7, First line format, Version 10
Superseded by: X11/1997-25, First line format, Version 11

Submitted: 5 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG9 made substantive corrections. SC 15 accepted as replacement type B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1991-13, First Line Format as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed 20 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG8/1993-1, First Line Format, version 2 as amended (also known as X11/SC15/TG9/93-1) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG8/1992-1, First Line Format, version 1 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1993-4, First Line Format, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG8/1993-1, First Line Format, version 2 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-3, First Line Format, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1993-4, First Line Format, version 3 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 8 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-3, First Line Format, version 4 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-105
Parameter Passing Clean-Up, version 2

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-5, Parameter Passing Clean-Up, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-35, Parameter Passing Clean-Up, version 4

Submitted: 5 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG9 recommends elevation to SC A. SC15 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-2, Parameter Passing Clean-Up, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1994-50, Memo from Sorenson 13 December 1994 and X11/1995-52, Response to Sorenson Letter of 13 April 1995 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-2, Parameter Passing Clean-Up, version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-122
Letter to Thank Members of Appeals Panels

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
August 31, 1995 letter from EDM to the Appeals Panels thanking them for their work.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-114
Chairman Letter 30 August 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
Chairman's letter, August 30, 1995, for the front of the pre-meeting mailing.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-120
Appeals Panel 1 Report 30 August 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
Summary report by the Appeals Panel on Procedure for Involvement of International Interests in Canvass Process, August 30, 1995. APR 96: sent to canvass lists for X11.1 and X11.2
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-121
Appeals Panel 2 Report 30 August 1895

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
Summary report of Appeals panel on Technical Aspects of the Standard as Submitted to Canvass, August 30, 1995. APRIL 96: sent to canvass lists for X11.1 and X11.2
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-103
Subject Matter for Appeals

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1995-120, Appeals Panel 1 Report 30 August 1995
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
To: Appeals panelists and MDC members Subject: Subject matter for the appeals Very large document, July 20, 1995, from Henry Heffernan, detailing information about his appeals and objections to X11.1 and X11.2 canvass and processes.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC15/TG17/1995-2
PUSH and POP, version 3

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1996-2, PUSH and POP, version 4

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
PU[SH] and PO[P] proposal, a multi-level QUIT construct. OCT 95: SC15/TG17 discussed.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-18, PUSH and POP, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/1995-71, PUSH and POP, version 2 to Task Group superseding X11/SC15/1994-18, PUSH and POP, version 1 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG8/1995-4
POSIX MUMPS Application Programmer Interface Communications

Discussed in: SC12/TG8 System Facility Interfaces
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Administrative

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
E-mail communications concerning POSIX MUMPS API in August 1995.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-8
FORMAT Library Function

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1996-2, FORMAT Library Function Revised
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1996-8, Format library function revision, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1997-2, Format library function, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-10, Format library function, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1999-1, FORMAT Library function, version 6

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13/TG2 failed to recommend elevation to SC B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/TG1/1992-3, $FO[rmat] Function to be remanded to Subcommittee 13, Task Group 2 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1995-4, $FO[rmat] Function and ssvns, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-32, $FO[rmat] Function and ssvns, version 1 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 10 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-33
linebody Syntax, version 1B

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Liam McSwiney
Sponsor: Lee J. Hirz
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
Linebody syntax. Only apparent editorial history differences from version 1A (X11/SC15/95-29). OCT 95: SC15/TG9 recommends not accepting as SC C. SC15 failed to accept as type C. JAN 96: Letter to Hirz/McSwiney (X11/96-8) explaining why the MDC did not accept proposal.
Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-29, linebody Syntax, version 1A failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 21 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1995-15
Names for charsets, version 3

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/1995-88, Names for charsets, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1996-45, Charset names, version 4

Submitted: 7 Sep 1995
Description:
Oct 95: this was incomplete and superseded by X11/95-88.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1987-4, International Character Set, X11/SC1/TG1/1987-5, Character Set for the Dutch Language and X11/SC1/TG1/1987-6, Character Set, European passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-7, Names for charsets, version 1 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1995-16
Null Device, version 6

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC FAILED to elevate to type A. MAR 96: SC12/TG9 amended.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 and X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device passed 8 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG2/1995-5
charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 3

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-3, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-42, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 5

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC12 elevates to SC A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1987-4, International Character Set, X11/SC1/TG1/1987-5, Character Set for the Dutch Language and X11/SC1/TG1/1987-6, Character Set, European passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG2/1995-4
String and M[UMPS] Collation, version 1

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-2, String and M[UMPS] Collation, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1996-41, String and M[UMPS] collation, version 3

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC12 elevates to SC A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1987-4, International Character Set, X11/SC1/TG1/1987-5, Character Set for the Dutch Language and X11/SC1/TG1/1987-6, Character Set, European passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-7, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1995-2, charset ISO-8859-1-USA, version 2 passed without dissent.