X11/SC15/1996-11
Taking M[UMPS] Beyond the Year 2000

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Frans S.C. Witte
Sponsor: Frans S.C. Witte
Superseded by: X11/SC16/1997-2, Taking M[UMPS] beyond 2000, version 2

Submitted: 18 Mar 1996
Description:
MAR 96: Proposal in 3 parts from MDCC-E discussions. SC15/TG2 recommends elevation to SC B. SEPT 96: SC15 elevates to type B.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed without dissent.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG10/1996-1
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG10, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13/TG10 Reference and Naked Indicator
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC12/TG9/1996-3
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG9, March 1996

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/TG2/1996-1
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG2, March 1996

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Charles M. Link III
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/1996-12
M[UMPS] Object Extensions

Discussed in: SC15/TG2 Object Oriented Programming
Proposer: Paul D. Grabscheid
Sponsor: Paul D. Grabscheid
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-19, M[UMPS] object extensions, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG2/WG1/1995-19, Object Usage, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG2/1997-4, Object usage, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG2/1998-2, Object usage, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1999-5, Object Usage, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG2/1996-2, M[UMPS] object extensions amendment

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: TG2 recommends elevation to SC B. Amended and accepted by SC15.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC13/TG13/1996-3
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG13, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/TG17/1996-3
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG17, March 1996

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC12/TG10/1996-1
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG10, March 1996

Discussed in: SC12/TG10 Model
Proposer: Frans S.C. Witte
Sponsor: Frans S.C. Witte
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC12/1996-7
Minutes Subcommittee 12, March 1996

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1996-4
Operator Overrides, version 11

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-10, Operator overrides, version 12
Superseded by: X11/1996-74, Operator overrides, version 13

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: SC12 amended and elevated to SC type A.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-34, Comparison Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-12, Operator Overrides, version 1 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 5 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-25, Operator Overrides, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1994-1, Operator Overrides, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to remand X11/SC12/1995-13, Operator Overrides, version 9 to Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-13, Operator Overrides, version 9 and X11/SC12/1996-1, Operator Overrides, version 10 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1996-6
Null Device, version 7

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: accepted as replacement SC type B.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 and X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device passed 8 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1996-5
Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 4

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/1996-44, Improve mnemonicspace handling, version 5

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
Improve Mnemonicspace Handling. Mar 96: SC12 recommends elevation to MDC type A. MDC makes it so.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-2, Fix mnemonicspace Failings as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-1, KEY passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-8, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-4, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 1 passed by a vote of 3 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-12, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-8, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 2 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-12, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 3 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-12, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG7/1996-1
ssvn for User and Group ID, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG7 Security
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-8, ssvn for user/group ID, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-11, ssvn for user/group ID, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1997-8, ssvn for user/group ID, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-10, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-11, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-8, ssvn for user and group ID, version 8

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
SSVN for User/Group Identification. Mar 96: SC12 amends and elevates to SC type A.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn to Task Group 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn passed by a vote of 2 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2
Miscellaneous Character Functions

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1996-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2b
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1996-7, Miscellaneous character functions, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-21, Miscellaneous character functions, version 6

Submitted: 4 Apr 1996
Description:
Miscellaneous character functions. Mar 96: SC12 elevated to type C.
Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG5/1996-4
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG5, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Daniel Bormann
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC13/TG15/1995-6
Local Variable Storage, version 3

Discussed in: SC13/TG15 Local Variable Storage
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Sponsor: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG15/1997-3, Local variable storage, version 4

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: SC13 elevates to type A. SEPT 97: discussed in SC13/TG15, decided not to bring forward yet.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-77, Process Specific Global Variables, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 15 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC1/1990-77, Process Specific Global Variables, version 1 to Subcommittee 15 passed without dissent.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to rescind X11/SC1/1990-77, Process Specific Global Variables, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1994-23, Process Specific Global Variables, version 2 to Task Group 15 (automatic Type status) superseding X11/SC1/1990-77, Process Specific Global Variables, version 1 passed 22 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/TG15/1995-1, Local Variable Storage, version 1 (also known as X11/SC13/TG15/95-1) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1994-23, Process Specific Global Variables, version 2 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG15/1995-2, Local Variable Storage, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/TG15/1995-1, Local Variable Storage, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG15/1995-2, Local Variable Storage, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1
User Definable ssvns, version 4

Discussed in: SC13/TG16 User Defined ssvns
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-8, User defined ssvns, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-2, User defined ssvns, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-7, User defined ssvns, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1998-19, User defined ssvns, version 10

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: TG16 recommends demotion to type C because functionality is duplicated by object orientation. SC13 did not demote.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 14 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1995-8, User Definable ssvns, version 1a as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1995-5, User Definable ssvns, version 3 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 12 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/TG8/1996-1
Appeal Form, version 1

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1996-5, Appeal Form, version 2
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MDC Appeal Form for people appealing MDC actions.

X11/TG8/1996-5
Appeal Form, version 2

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MDC Appeal Form for people appealing MDC actions. MAR 96: accepted as standing document with X11/TG8/96-3.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/TG8/1996-3
Appeals Application

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
Appeals Application Form and Fee change to the MDC Appeals Procedure. MAR 96: accepted as an addition to X11/95-127, Appeals Procedure.
Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a standing document passed 25 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/TG8/1996-4
Remand to Task Group

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Standing document

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
Remand to TG = Type C Status, change to X11 proposal rules. MAR 96: accepted as amendment to X11/91-25, X11 Proposal Rules.
Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type C document of the MUMPS Development Committee passed 25 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1996-25
Comments by David Marcus 17 March 1996

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Administrative

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MDC proposal comments, 3/17/96, David Marcus. Comments on several proposals in the the pre-mtg mailing.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC14/TG6/1996-1
Socket Requirements Comments

Discussed in: SC14/TG6 TCP/IP
Proposer: Bernhard Metzger
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-1, Sockets binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-14, Sockets binding, version 3

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
Socket requirements comments, 3/21/96, Bernard Metzger.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/1996-13
Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 3

Discussed in: SC15/TG16 Indirection
Proposer: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Sponsor: Frederick D.S. Marshall
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-42, Subscript indirection and LOCK, version 4

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: SC15 elevates to SC type A.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 1 to Task Group 16 (automatic Type C status) passed 7 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG16/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG16/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 2 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/TG16/1995-3, Subscript Indirection and L[ock] Command, version 2 failed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/1996-10
Fix algoref

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-15, Fix algoref, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-2, Fix algoref, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-13, Fix algoref, Version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-5, Fix algoref, version 5

Submitted: 8 Apr 1996
Description:
MAR 96: SC15 accepts as type C.
Published:
Apr 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/1996-28
Letter from MDC to Henry G. Heffernan 9 April 1996

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 9 Apr 1996
Description:
Letter from EdM to HH, April 9, 1996. Concerns the disposition of the '53 NIST issues'. Copy sent to ANSI.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/TG11/1996-2
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG11, March 1996

Discussed in: SC15/TG11 Portability Size Issues
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 11 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/1996-20
Appeal BSR X11.1 and 2 Response Addition

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 15 Apr 1996
Description:
Letter and documentation to ANSI from Ed de Moel, March 15, 1996. Concerning the appeal by H Heffernan to X11.1 and X11.2. Packet is listing of additional documentation.
Published:
Apr 1996

X11/1996-29
Minutes MDC, 20 March 1996

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 15 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed by voice vote.
  

X11/SC13/TG16/1996-2
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG16, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13/TG16 User Defined ssvns
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 15 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC12/TG11/1996-1
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG11, March 1996

Discussed in: SC12/TG11 ssvn for Portability and Conformance
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 15 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC15/1996-14
Minutes Subcommittee 15, March 1996

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 15 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/TG3/1996-1
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG3, March 1996

Discussed in: SC14/TG3 Network Syntax
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/TG4/1996-2
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG4, March 1996

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC14/TG6/1996-2
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG6, March 1996

Discussed in: SC14/TG6 TCP/IP
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG17/1996-1
Minutes MDC/TG17, March 1996

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC14/1996-4
Minutes Subcommittee 14, March 1996

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as amended passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/TG6/1996-2
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG6, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 16 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/SC13/1996-7
Minutes Subcommittee 13, March 1996

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Daniel Bormann
Superseded

Submitted: 18 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

X11/1996-33
Minutes MDC, 23 March 1996

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 22 Apr 1996

Published:
Apr 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/1996-36
Appeal BSR X11.1 and 2 Decision

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 26 Apr 1996
Description:
Letter from ANSI to MDC dated April 25, 1996. Concerning the appeal of the BSR's decision to approve X11.1 and X11.2. Decision was to deny the appeals and sustain its original decision to approve the standards. APR 96: sent to canvass lists for X11.1 and X11.2 MAY 96: we received a revised version JUL 96: sent to canvass lists for X11.1 and X11.2
Published:
Apr 1996
Aug 1996

X11/1996-37
Response to ANSI Approval X11.1 and X11.2

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 30 Apr 1996
Description:
Letter from EdM to ANSI, dated 21 March 1996 (actually it was 26 April 1996). Response to ANSI notification (April 25) of denial of HH appeals and approval of X11.1 and X11.2.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/SC12/1996-8
ssvn for user/group ID, version 3

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-11, ssvn for user/group ID, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1997-8, ssvn for user/group ID, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-10, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-11, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-8, ssvn for user and group ID, version 8

Submitted: 31 May 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn to Task Group 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn passed by a vote of 2 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG7/1996-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/1996-21
Appeals procedure 96

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 31 May 1996
Description:
MDC Appeals Procedure adopting, for the most part, ANSI Annex A Clause 12 of ANSI Procedures. X11/95-127 was amended in October 1995 (X11/95-133, pg 3 of 18) and March 1996 (X11/96-33).
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1992-28, Appeals Procedure, version 5 as a standing document superseding X11/TG8/1992-23, Appeals Procedure, version 4 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1995-127, Appeals Procedure 1995, version 2 as amended superseding X11/TG8/1992-28, Appeals Procedure, version 5 and X11/TG8/1995-4, Appeals Procedure 1995, version 1 passed 29 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1996-39
Letter to Anne Caldas 960530

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 3 Jun 1996
Description:
Letter from EdM to Caldas, 30 May 1996. Implementation of the recommendations made by MDC's Appeals Panels in August 1995. Sent with X11/96-38, letter from John Hill to EdM, 16 May 1996. And sent with X11/96-24, letter from EdM to John Hill, 8 April 1996.
Discussed:
X11/1996-24, Letter to John Hill 960408
X11/1996-38, Letter from John Hill 960516
X11/1996-56, Letter from Anne Caldas - Re: John Hill 960730
X11/1996-55, Letter to John Hill 960730
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-38
Letter from John Hill 960516

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 3 Jun 1996
Description:
Letter from John Hill, 16 May 1996. Reply to EdM letter X11/96-24, 8 April 1996, concerning implementation of appeals panel recommendations. Sent to ANSI with X11/96-39 on 3 June 96.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-24
Letter to John Hill 960408

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 3 Jun 1996
Description:
Letter from EdM to John Hill, 8 April 1996, concerning implementation of recommendations of Appeals Panel. Sent to ANSI with X11/96-39, and X11/96-38, on 3 June 96.
Discussed:
X11/1996-38, Letter from John Hill 960516
X11/1996-39, Letter to Anne Caldas 960530
X11/1996-56, Letter from Anne Caldas - Re: John Hill 960730
X11/1996-55, Letter to John Hill 960730
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/SC13/1996-9
Minor arithmetic improvements

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-7, Mathematics errors, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-1, Mathematics errors, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-9, Mathematics errors, Version 6

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC13 remanded to TG.
Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand this document to task group 5 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3
User defined ssvns, version 5

Discussed in: SC13/TG16 User Defined ssvns
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-8, User defined ssvns, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-2, User defined ssvns, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-7, User defined ssvns, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1998-19, User defined ssvns, version 10

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: discussed in MDC/TG18. Recommendations made to SC13. SC13/TG16 amended and recommended approval as SC type A. SC13 failed to elevate to SC type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 14 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1995-8, User Definable ssvns, version 1a as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1995-5, User Definable ssvns, version 3 failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 12 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 12 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1996-5
User definable I/O handling, version 4a

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
JUN 96: this is one of two options.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.