X11/SC13/1995-22
Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/1996-10, Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 4

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-7, Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-14, Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-7, Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 1 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1995-14, Reverse $Q[uery] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 28 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1995-23
Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 4

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Daniel Bormann
Superseded by: X11/1996-11, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 5

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC raised to type A, with editorial correction.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1993-13, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1994-49, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1993-13, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-15, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-49, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 2 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1995-15, Correction of Error in fncode Specification, version 3 passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 3 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-32
ssvn Formalization, version 6

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-4, ssvn Formalization, version 7
Superseded by: X11/1996-43, ssvn formalization, version 8

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC14/TG3 expressed concern about syntax of environment. SC15/TG13 amended.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC12/TG4/1993-2, ssvn Formalization, version 1 to Task Group (also known as X11/SC13/TG13/93-1) (automatic Type C status) passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG13/1994-1, ssvn Formalization, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC12/TG4/1993-2, ssvn Formalization, version 1 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-21, ssvn Formalization, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG13/1994-1, ssvn Formalization, version 2 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-32, ssvn Formalization, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-21, ssvn Formalization, version 3 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/1995-11, ssvn Formalization, version 5 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/TG6/1995-7
TCP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding

Discussed in: SC14/TG6 TCP/IP
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1995-8, Sockets-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-1, Sockets binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-14, Sockets binding, version 3

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to withdraw X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding as a Type C document of Subcommittee 14 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to amend X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-5, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-4, TCP/IP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding and X11/SC14/TG6/1995-3, TCP/IP-MUMPS Binding passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/TG6/1995-8
Sockets-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding

Discussed in: SC14/TG6 TCP/IP
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1996-3, Sockets-MUMPS mnemonics binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC14/TG6/1996-4, Sockets mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG14/1997-3, Sockets binding
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-1, Sockets binding, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1998-14, Sockets binding, version 3

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC14 raised to replacement SC B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1990-8, TCP Binding, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1989-16, TCP Binding, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 9 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 9 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to withdraw X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding as a Type C document of Subcommittee 14 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/1993-29, TCP/IP Binding passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC9/1991-2, TCP Binding, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to amend X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-2, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-3, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 1, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-1, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 2 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1993-2, Revised TCP Binding Cover-Letter, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to rescind X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 (superseded by X11/SC14/TG6/94-2) passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC9/1991-5, TCP Binding, version 4, X11/SC14/TG6/1994-3, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 1 and X11/SC14/TG6/1994-5, TCP-MUMPS Binding Formalization, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1994-6, TCP-MUMPS Functions, version 2 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG6/1995-4, TCP/IP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-1, TCP-MUMPS Binding and X11/SC14/TG6/1995-3, TCP/IP-MUMPS Binding passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG6/1995-7, TCP-MUMPS Mnemonics Binding passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/1995-123
ANSI Procedures

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Administrative

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
ANSI Procedures for the Development and Coordination of American National Standards. March 22, 1995, pre-publication copy.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC12/1995-9
Scope of Work Subcommittee 12/TG2

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1997-5, Scope of work SC12/TG2 1997

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-11, Internationalization Project, version 2 as amended superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-8, Internationalization Project, version 1 passed 6 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC12/TG11/1995-3
ssvns for Portability, version 4

Discussed in: SC12/TG11 ssvn for Portability and Conformance
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC12/TG11 amends and recommends elevation to SC A. SC12 fails to elevate. SEPT 96: TG11 recommends demotion to type C. SC12 makes it so. MAR 97: SC12 rescinds.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG11/1995-1, ssvns for Portability, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG11/1994-3, ssvns for Portability, version 2 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG11/1995-1, ssvns for Portability, version 3 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 4 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG11/1995-1, ssvns for Portability, version 3 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to rescind this document superseding X11/SC12/TG11/1995-1, ssvns for Portability, version 3 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-9
Pattern Negation, version 5

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/1996-9, Pattern Negation, version 6

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1992-6, Pattern Match, Enhanced as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-33, Pattern Functions passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 6 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-2, Pattern Negation, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-4, Pattern Negation, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-2, Pattern Negation, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-20, Pattern Negation, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/95-16.1, Pattern Negation, version 3 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1995-20, Pattern Negation, version 4 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-10
Pattern Ranges, version 4

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1996-1, Pattern Ranges, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1996-4, Pattern ranges, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1997-3, Pattern ranges, version 7

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13/TG2 recommends as replacement SC13 type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-5, Pattern Ranges, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-3, Pattern Ranges, version 1 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 7 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-17, Pattern Ranges, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-5, Pattern Ranges, version 2 failed by a vote of 10 in favor, 10 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-17, Pattern Ranges, version 3 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG5/1995-11
Mathematics Errors, version 1

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-3, Mathematics Errors, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-6, Mathematics errors, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-7, Mathematics errors, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-1, Mathematics errors, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-9, Mathematics errors, Version 6

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5
Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: proposed as replacement SC13 type B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-53, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-18, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-107
Standard routineparameters, version 4

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-1, Standard routineparameters, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-5, Standard routineparameters, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1997-2, Standard routineparameters, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1997-5, Standard routineparameters, Version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-9, Standard routineparameters, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-12, Standard routineparameters, version 10

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT95: proposed as replacement type B. SC15/TG9 amended and SC15 accepted as replacement SC B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 and X11/SC15/TG9/95-6.1, Standard routineparameters, version 2 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 6 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG13/1995-1
Scope of Work Subcommittee 15, Task Group 13 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG13 ssvn Syntax
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Withdrawn

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC15/TG17/1995-3
Implicit N[ew] Commands in Subroutines, version 1

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1996-1, Implicit N[ew] Commands in Subroutines, version 2

Submitted: 8 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-124
Appeals Process ANSI Confirmation

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Administrative

Submitted: 11 Sep 1995
Description:
Letter from ANSI, 31 August 1995, confirming that X11/94-22 fulfills ANSI requirements that we have an appeals process.
Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-125
Letter from VAMC - Tuscaloosa Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Membership

Submitted: 11 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-126
Letter from Jacquard Systems Research Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Membership

Submitted: 11 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC13/1995-24
S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 4

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1996-2, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1996-12, Set $QS[ubscript] pseudofunction, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-4, Set $QS[ubscript] pseudofunction, version 7
Superseded by: X11/1997-22, Set $QS[ubscript] pseudo function, Version 8

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13 amended and recommended elevation to MDC type A. MDC FAILED to elevate to type A. Therefore, demoted to SC type B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-9, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-5, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-9, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 2 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 3 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 20 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A as amended superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 passed 16 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC13/TG10/1995-3
Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 6

Discussed in: SC13/TG10 Reference and Naked Indicator
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13/TG10 amends and recommends elevation to SC B. SC13 makes it so. MAR 96: SC13/TG10 recommends demotion to type C. SC13 makes it so. SEPT 96: SC13 rescinded.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG10/1993-5, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1993-3, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 1 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG10/1994-4, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1993-5, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 2 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 18 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG10/1994-7, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1994-4, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 3 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 13 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG10/1995-1, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 5 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1994-7, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 4 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1995-1, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 5 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1995-1, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 5 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to rescind this document superseding X11/SC13/TG10/1995-1, Naked Indicator During M[erge] Command, version 5 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-34
Portable Length Limit for names, version 7

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/1996-13, Portable Length Limit for names, version 8

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-10, Portable Length Limit for names, version 1 (remanded to Task Group 11) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed 17 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1993-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-10, Portable Length Limit for names, version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1993-5, Portable Length Limit for names, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG11/1993-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC15/1994-28, Portable Length Limit for names, version 4A for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/TG11/1993-5, Portable Length Limit for names, version 3 and X11/SC15/1994-29, Portable Length Limit for names, version 4B passed 20 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1994-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 5 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-28, Portable Length Limit for names, version 4A passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1995-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG11/1994-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 5 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG11/1995-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 6 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/TG11/1995-1, Portable Length Limit for names, version 6 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/1995-35
Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 4

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1996-3, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-13, Naming $M[UMPS] syntax errors, version 6

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG9 recommends elevation to SC A. SC15 failed to elevate.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-8, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 9 opposed and 10 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-10, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-8, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 1 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 11 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-5, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-10, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-5, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 16 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-36
Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-6, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-18, Portable length limit strings, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-4, Portable length limit strings, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1997-23, Portable length limit strings, Version 6

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

Vote

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1995-2, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG11/1995-4
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG11, June 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG11 Portability Size Issues
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/SC15/TG17/1995-4
M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 5

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Bob Isch
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1996-4, M[UMPS] block structuring, version 6

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: TG17 recommends elevation to SC B. SC15 makes it so. NOV 95: MDCC-E would like to see this proposal divided.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-6, Structured Programming, version 1 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 19 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-100, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 4 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1995-13
Operator Overrides, version 9

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-4, Operator Overrides, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-10, Operator overrides, version 12
Superseded by: X11/1996-74, Operator overrides, version 13

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports. OCT 95: MDC remanded to SC 12.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-34, Comparison Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-12, Operator Overrides, version 1 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 5 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-25, Operator Overrides, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1994-1, Operator Overrides, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to remand this document to Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12
User Definable I/O Handling, version 2

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-5, User definable I/O handling, version 4a
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-6, User definable I/O handling, version 4b
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8, User definable I/O handling amendment
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-6, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, version 3

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports. OCT 95: SC12 fails to elevate to SC A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG16/1995-4
User Definable ssvns, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG16 User Defined ssvns
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1995-5, User Definable ssvns, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-1, User Definable ssvns, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-3, User defined ssvns, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG16/1996-5, User defined ssvns, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-8, User defined ssvns, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-2, User defined ssvns, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-7, User defined ssvns, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1998-19, User defined ssvns, version 10

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 to Task Group (automatic Type C status) passed 14 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1995-8, User Definable ssvns, version 1a as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC15/1995-1, User Definable ssvns, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1995-12
Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 3

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-5, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1996-44, Improve mnemonicspace handling, version 5

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: MDC remanded to SC12.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-2, Fix mnemonicspace Failings as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-1, KEY passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-8, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-4, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 1 passed by a vote of 3 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-8, Improve mnemonicspace Handling, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/1995-10
Device Environment, version 6

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Superseded by: X11/1996-51, Device environment, version 7

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports. OCT 95: SC14/TG3 made editorial change and recommends elevation to MDC type A. MDC raises to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-2, Device Space, Networking, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-13, Device Space, Networking, version 2 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-2, Device Space, Networking, version 3 passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1993-14, Device Environment, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1993-14, Device Environment, version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1993-11, Device Environment, version 1 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1994-3, Device Environment, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1993-14, Device Environment, version 2 passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1995-1, Device Environment, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG3/1994-3, Device Environment, version 3 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/1995-4, Device Environment, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG3/1995-1, Device Environment, version 4 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/1995-4, Device Environment, version 5 passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/1995-4, Device Environment, version 5 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/1995-37
Routine Management, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Keith Snell
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Superseded by: X11/1996-52, Routine management, version 3

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
SEPT 95: MDCC-E supports. OCT 95: MDC amended and raised to type A.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/TG13/1989-1, Routine Editing passed 25 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 12 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 to Task Group passed by a show of hands.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-10, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG13/1989-1, Routine Editing and X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 8 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-36, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding MDC-17, Type A Corrections 6 May 1987 and X11/SC1/1990-10, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 2 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 9 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-85, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-36, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 3 failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 7 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-106, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-85, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 4 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-50, Minimal Routine Editing, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1991-53, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 6 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-53, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-106, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 5 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 to Task Group superseding X11/SC15/1991-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 3 passed 15 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-4) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1992-1, Minimal Routine Editing, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 7 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1993-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1992-1, Minimal Routine Editing, version 5 failed by a vote of 10 in favor, 20 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend X11/SC15/TG10/1993-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1992-1, Minimal Routine Editing, version 5 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 5 opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/TG10/1993-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 6 to Task Group 10 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1992-1, Minimal Routine Editing, version 5 passed 20 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1994-19, RO[utine] Command, version 1 to Task Group 10 passed without dissent.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-5, Minimal Routine Editing, version 7 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1993-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 6 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/95-1.1, Routine Management, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-3, S[et] $T[ext], X11/SC15/1994-31, RO[utine] Command, version 2 and X11/SC15/TG9/1994-9, Routine Editing, version 8 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC15/TG9/95-1.1, Routine Management, version 1 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-38
Error Handling Corrections, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1996-5, Error handling corrections, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1997-1, Error handling corrections, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1997-5, Error handling corrections, Version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1998-2, Error handling corrections, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-5, Error handling corrections, version 7

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG17 recommended elevation to SC B. SC15 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995
Oct 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/1995-64, Error Handling Corrections, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1995-64, Error Handling Corrections, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1995-39
Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC15/TG17 recommends elevation to SC B. SC15 makes it so. SEPT 97: SC15 demotes to type C 19-3-2. MAR 98: referred to SC15. Remanded to TG17. SEPT 98: TG17 recommends recision. SC15 makes it so.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-23, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-16, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 1 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC13/1992-23, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 2 for transfer to Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC13/1991-16, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 1 passed by a show of hands.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-26, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC13/1992-23, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 2 failed by a vote of 10 in favor, 14 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 5 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 to Task Group 17 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-26, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 3 and X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-26, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 3 and X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Buckhead, Georgia, on 22 March 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand this document Task Group 17 superseding X11/SC15/1993-26, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 3 and X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to rescind this document superseding X11/SC15/1993-26, Q[uit] Command Parameters, version 3 and X11/1995-66, Q[uit] Command with Return Value Revisited, version 1 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG3/1995-4
Data Record Functions, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG3 Set Positional
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1996-2, Data record functions, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1997-2, Data record functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-2, Data record functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-3, Data record functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-4, Data record functions, version 7

Submitted: 12 Sep 1995
Description:
OCT 95: SC13 elevates to type B.
Published:
Sep 1995

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/1995-67, Data Record Functions, version 1 to Task Group passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/1995-67, Data Record Functions, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 10 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/TG18/1995-3
ssvn Registration List September 1995

Discussed in: TG18 ssvn Coordination
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Sponsor: Keith Snell
Standing document

Submitted: 14 Sep 1995

Published:
Sep 1995

X11/1995-105
Relevant Documents for the Hearing of 25 July 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 25 Jul 1995
Description:
FAX from H.Heffernan on July 25, 1995. "Documents that I have suggested to the Appeals Panels as relevant to the issues in the Appeals."
Published:
Dec 1995

X11/1995-128
Henry G. Heffernan STATUS of Appeals 29 September 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Henry G. Heffernan
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 5 Oct 1995
Description:
Status of Appeals and Proposed Remedial Actions. From HH 29 September 1995.
Published:
Dec 1995

X11/1995-127
Appeals Procedure 1995, version 2

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/1996-21, Appeals procedure 96
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 12 Oct 1995
Description:
Appeals Procedure adopting ANSI March 22, 1995 Annex A Clause 12, with exceptions. OCT 95: GB special mailing. MDC/TG8 amended and recommended adoption as a standing document. MDC accepted as Standing Document.
Published:
Dec 1995

Votes

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1992-28, Appeals Procedure, version 5 as a standing document superseding X11/TG8/1992-23, Appeals Procedure, version 4 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as amended superseding X11/TG8/1992-28, Appeals Procedure, version 5 and X11/TG8/1995-4, Appeals Procedure 1995, version 1 passed 29 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/1995-92
Constitution 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Standing document

Submitted: 12 Oct 1995
Description:
OCT 95: GB special mailing.
Published:
Dec 1995

Votes

• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 3 to accept X11/SC3/1990-15, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 1 as a constitutional change failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 3 to accept X11/SC3/1990-16, Constitution Revision - Bylaws, version 1 as a constitutional change passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 3 to accept X11/SC3/1990-17, Constitution Revision - Election, version 1 as a constitutional change passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC3/1990-23, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-15, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 1 passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 3 to accept X11/SC3/1990-23, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 3 superseding X11/SC3/1990-15, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 1 passed 6 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1991-1, Constitution Revision - Bylaws, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-16, Constitution Revision - Bylaws, version 1 failed by a vote of 31 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1991-2, Constitution Revision - Election, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-17, Constitution Revision - Election, version 1 failed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 30 May 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1991-2, Constitution Revision - Election, version 2 as a standing document superseding X11/SC3/1990-17, Constitution Revision - Election, version 1 passed 36 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC3/1990-23, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-15, Constitution Revision - Membership, version 1 passed 44 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1991-1, Constitution Revision - Bylaws, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-16, Constitution Revision - Bylaws, version 1 passed 44 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1991-3, Amending the Constitution as a constitutional change passed 37 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1992-10, Constitution Revision - Subcommittee 1 as a constitutional change passed by a vote of 45 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1992-18, Clarification of MDCC Status, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/TG8/92-16.1, Clarification of MDCC Status, version 1 passed 46 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1992-17, Clarification of MDC Member Representative Status as a constitutional change passed 46 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1992-89, Constitution November 1992 as amended as a constitutional change superseding X11/SC3/1990-13, Subcommittee 3 Bylaws Change, version 2, X11/1992-33, Constitution July 1992, X11/TG8/1992-18, Clarification of MDCC Status, version 2 and X11/TG8/1992-17, Clarification of MDC Member Representative Status passed by a vote of 35 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/TG8/1995-1, Constitutional Amendment Dues Voting, version 1 as a constitutional change passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1995-29, Constitutional Amendment Dues Voting, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/TG8/1995-1, Constitutional Amendment Dues Voting, version 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/1995-87, Constitutional Amendment Working Groups, version 2 as a constitutional change superseding X11/TG8/1995-3, Constitutional Amendment Working Groups, version 1 passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-109
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG9, June 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC15/TG17/1995-5
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG17, October 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Wally Fort
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC12/TG11/1995-4
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG11, October 1995

Discussed in: SC12/TG11 ssvn for Portability and Conformance
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC15/TG11/1995-5
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG11, October 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG11 Portability Size Issues
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC15/TG9/1995-110
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG9, October 1995

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/1995-130
Minutes MDCC-E, September 1995

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Keith Snell
Sponsor: Keith Snell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC13/TG10/1995-4
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG10, October 1995

Discussed in: SC13/TG10 Reference and Naked Indicator
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC12/1995-17
Minutes Subcommittee 12/SC11, October 1995

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Oct 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1995-11
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG2, October 1995

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: David J. Whitten
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Nov 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/SC12/TG9/1995-13
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG9, October 1995

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Nov 1995

Published:
Dec 1995

X11/TG8/1995-12
Minutes MDC/TG8, October 1995

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Nov 1995

Published:
Dec 1995