X11/SC15/92-31.1
EXECUTE Clarification, version 2 or

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1993-15, EXECUTE Clarification, version 3 X[ecute] Command ?
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1993-28, Spaces at End of Line, version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1993-39, Spaces at End of Line, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1995-96, Spaces at End of Line, version 3

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
eXecute Command Clarification. Oct 92: editorial changes, raised to SC type B. JAN 93: revised version X11/SC15/TG10/92-6 failed to reach SC15 type A by mail ballot.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.

Votes

• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-7, EXECUTE Clarification, version 1 Command Execution as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/1989-7, EXECUTE Interpretation passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-6) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-7, EXECUTE Clarification, version 1 Command Execution failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1992-53
Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-18, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-38, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-60, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
Unsubscripted $ORDER.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  

X11/SC13/1992-54
Complex Arithmetic, version 2

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/1995-14, Complex Mathematical Library Functions, version 7

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
Complex Arithmetic.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.

Published:
Sep 1992

X11/SC15/TG10/1992-1
Minimal Routine Editing, version 5

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: George F. Timson
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG10/1993-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG10/1994-5, Minimal Routine Editing, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1994-9, Routine Editing, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/95-1.1, Routine Management, version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-37, Routine Management, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1996-52, Routine management, version 3

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
Routine editing. Proposed as a revised SC type B. OCT 92: amended by SC15, accepted as revised SC 15 type B. JAN 93: revised version X11/SC15/TG10/92-4 raised to SC15 type A by mail ballot.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.

Votes

• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to table X11/SC1/TG13/1989-1, Routine Editing passed 25 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 12 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 to Task Group passed by a show of hands.
  
• In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-10, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/TG13/1989-1, Routine Editing and X11/SC1/1989-17, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 1 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 8 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-36, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding MDC-17, Type A Corrections 6 May 1987 and X11/SC1/1990-10, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 2 passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 9 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-85, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-36, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 3 failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 7 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-106, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-85, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 4 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-50, Minimal Routine Editing, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1991-53, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 6 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-53, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-106, F[ile] Command for Routine Editing, version 5 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 to Task Group superseding X11/SC15/1991-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 3 passed 15 in favor and 4 opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-4) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1991-2, Minimal Routine Editing, version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-6, Minimal Routine Editing, version 4 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 7 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG10/1992-2
Extension to $T[ext] Function version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG10/1993-1, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 3
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
$TEXT Extension. Proposed as a revised SC type B. Oct 92: Accepted as SC15 revised type B. JAN 93: Revised version X11/SC15/TG10/92-5 raised to SC15 type A by mail ballot.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92. Oct 92: SC15 report says raised to SC15 type A, but Alan Frank's summary of SC15 votes says that only accepted as revised type B.

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended (first part, $TEXT extension) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended to Task Group 13 (second part, FILE command) passed 24 in favor and 16 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 22 opposed and 9 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to rescind X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE) passed unanimously.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to table X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing passed 19 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 to Task Group superseding X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing passed 15 in favor and 5 opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (mail ballot, also known as X11/SC15/TG10/92-5) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1992-5, Extension to $T[ext] Function version 1 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG10/1992-3
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG10, September 1992

Discussed in: SC15/TG10 Routine Management
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 25 Sep 1992

Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.

Published:
Sep 1992

X11/SC13/1992-60
$H[orolog] System Function, version 5

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-21, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-3, $H[orolog] system function, version 2.1

Submitted: 29 Oct 1992
Description:
$HOROLOG System Function.
Comments:
Oct 92: Micronetics special mailing. Handout.

Published:
Nov 1992

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-46, $H[orolog] Function, version 1 to Task Group passed by a show of hands.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to remand X11/SC1/1988-46, $H[orolog] Function, version 1 to Task Group passed by a majority.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 8 to accept X11/SC1/1991-18, $H[orolog] System Function, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 8 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-21, $H[orolog] System Function, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1989-44, $H[orolog] Function, version 2, X11/SC1/1990-39, $H[orolog] Function, Interpretation, X11/SC13/1991-15, $H[orolog] System Function, version 3 and X11/SC13/1992-2, $H[orolog] System Function - Amendment passed by a vote of 19 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to remove X11/SC13/1992-21, $H[orolog] System Function, version 4 from priority list superseding X11/SC1/1989-44, $H[orolog] Function, version 2, X11/SC1/1990-39, $H[orolog] Function, Interpretation, X11/SC13/1991-15, $H[orolog] System Function, version 3 and X11/SC13/1992-2, $H[orolog] System Function - Amendment passed 38 in favor and 6 opposed.
  

X11/SC13/1992-61
Record Operations

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Bernard P. Schoch
Sponsor: Bernard P. Schoch
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-10, A[TOMIC] Command

Submitted: 29 Oct 1992
Description:
Record Operations.
Comments:
Oct 92: Micronetics special mailing. Handout.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG11/1992-3
KILL Data or Descendents, version 2

Discussed in: SC13/TG11 Kill Data and Descendents
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: David J. Marcus
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG11/1993-1, KILL Data or Descendents, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-51, KILL Data or Descendents, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-15, KILL Data or Descendents, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-33, KILL Data or Descendents, version 6

Submitted: 29 Oct 1992
Description:
Kill Data and Kill Subscripts of glvns. OCT 93: SC13 remanded to TG11 for further work.
Comments:
Oct 92: Micronetics special mailing. Handout.

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand this document to Task Group 11 superseding X11/SC13/TG11/1992-2, KILL Data or Descendents, version 1 passed without dissent.
  

X11/TG15/1992-1
MDC, Task Group 15 Report October 1992

Discussed in: TG15 FIPS Response
Proposer: Alvin G. Byars
Sponsor: Alvin G. Byars
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 29 Oct 1992
Description:
Report to MDC, Oct 92, concerning their charge to respond to NIST for the objections to the approval of FIPS 125-1 (1990 ANSI) std.
Published:
Nov 1992

X11/TG11/1992-1
MDC, Task Group 11 Report October 1992

Discussed in: TG11 Life Cycle Processes
Proposer: Daniel K. Gray
Sponsor: Daniel K. Gray
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 29 Oct 1992
Description:
Report to the MDC, October 1992.
Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-88
Minutes MDC, October 1992

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Don E. Piccone
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 25 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/1992-41
Report Subcommittee 15, October 1992

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/TG14/1992-1
Minutes MDC/TG14, October 1992

Discussed in: TG14 Libraries
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC12/TG1/1992-5
Minutes Subcommittee 12/TG1, October 1992

Discussed in: SC12/TG1 Representation of Text
Proposer: R. Chris Richardson
Sponsor: R. Chris Richardson
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC12/1992-36
Minutes Subcommittee 12, October 1992

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1992-7
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG2, October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 30 Oct 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG5/1992-4
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG5, October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG6/1992-2
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG6, October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG6 Date and Time
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 2 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG10/1992-2
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG10, October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG10 Reference and Naked Indicator
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG13/1992-1
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG13, 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC15/TG7/1992-4
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG7, October 1992

Discussed in: SC15/TG7 SQL
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC15/TG9/1992-4
Minutes Subcommittee 15/TG9, October 1992

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC15/TG9/1992-3
N[ew] svn, version 2

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1993-9, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1994-7, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/94-13.1, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 3
Superseded by: X11/1994-47, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 4

Submitted: 5 Nov 1992
Description:
NEW svn Additions. OCT 92: failed to reach SC15 type B.
Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1992-2, N[ew] svn, version 1 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 14 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/1992-65
S[et] $X and $Y, version 5

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: David S. Novak
Sponsor: John Godfrey
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992
Description:
SET $X and SET $Y. OCT 92: accepted as RMDS type A.
Published:
Nov 1992

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1987-39, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 passed 37 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 failed 1 in favor and 27 opposed.
  
• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1988-42, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1.5 and X11/SC1/1987-39, S[et] $X and $Y, version 1 passed unanimously.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC1/1990-45, S[et] $X and $Y, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments and X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 passed by a vote of 50 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-45, S[et] $X and $Y, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/1989-2, S[et] $X and $Y, Comments and X11/1989-22, S[et] $X and $Y, version 2 passed by a vote of 45 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/1990-31, S[et] $X and $Y, version 4 passed without dissent.
  

X11/1992-73
Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 6

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Joop S. Duisterhout
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992
Description:
Extended Reference Syntax for Routines. Oct 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Published:
Nov 1992

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 7 to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 7 superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1989-11, Extended Reference Syntax for routines, version 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 2 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 4 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1991-1, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-5, Extended Reference Syntax for Routines, version 3 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/1992-93
Functions Returning environment, version 5

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992
Description:
Functions Returning Environment. Oct 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Published:
Nov 1992

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1991-1, Functions Returning environment, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 15 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/1991-4, Functions Returning environment, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 44 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to include X11/SC14/1992-4, Functions Returning environment, version 4 in next submission for ANSI standard approval superseding X11/SC14/91-5A, Functions Returning environment, version 3 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC7/1989-8
Minutes Subcommittee 7, October 1989

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

X11/SC7/1990-3
Minutes Subcommittee 7, June 1990

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

X11/SC14/1992-14
Minutes Subcommittee 14, October 1992

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document passed unanimously.
  

X11/SC14/TG2/1992-5
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG2, October 1992

Discussed in: SC14/TG2 Network Directions
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC14/TG3/1992-4
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG3, October 1992

Discussed in: SC14/TG3 Network Syntax
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC14/TG4/1992-7
Minutes Subcommittee 14/TG4, October 1992

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG12/1992-1
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG12, 6 October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG12 Increment Proposals
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC13/TG12/1992-2
Minutes Subcommittee 13/TG12, 19 October 1992

Discussed in: SC13/TG12 Increment Proposals
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 9 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-94
O[pen] Command Clarification, version 5

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 9 Nov 1992
Description:
OPEN command clarification.
Published:
Jan 1993

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/1991-5, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed 11 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-3, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1991-4, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 2 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1992-21, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-3, O[pen] Command Clarification, version 3 passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/TG4/WG5/1992-4
Windowing Event Processing, version 2

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Roger Partridge
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 9 Nov 1992
Description:
Event Processing for the Windowing API. Oct 92: mailed to SC11 and discussed during Windowing/Event Processing conference call.

X11/SC15/TG4/WG1/1992-4
Event Processing, Unified

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: David B. Brown
Sponsor: David B. Brown
Administrative

Submitted: 9 Nov 1992
Description:
Unified Event Processing Proposal. Includes comments from Joop Duisterhout. Oct 92: discussed in conference call of Windowing/Event Processing.

X11/1992-95
Letter from Isotech Re: Membership

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Bob Isch
Membership

Submitted: 19 Oct 1992
Description:
Membership application from Bob Isch, Isotech.
Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC11/TG4/WG1/1992-39
Windowing Application Programmer Interface, Attributes

Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Paul D. Grabscheid
Sponsor: Paul D. Grabscheid
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994

Submitted: 16 Oct 1992
Description:
Windowing API Attribute Summary. 13 October 1992. Paul Grabscheid.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

X11/1992-81
Character Set Definition Comments

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: John J. Althouse
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-26, Character Set Definition, version 11
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 19 Oct 1992
Description:
Comments on X11/SC12/92-15, Character Set Profile Definition.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-96
NIST 9 September 1992 - Validation

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Edward J. McIntosh
Administrative

Submitted: 19 Sep 1992
Description:
Packet from NIST. Validation questions (1-7). Sept 9, 1992.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-97
NIST 7 October 1992 - Validation

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Edward J. McIntosh
Administrative

Submitted: 17 Oct 1992
Description:
NIST packet. Validation questions (8-14, rev. 2,3). Oct 7, 1992.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-98
NIST 8 October 1992 - Validation

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Edward J. McIntosh
Administrative

Submitted: 18 Oct 1992
Description:
NIST packet. validation questions (15-21). Oct 8, 1992.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-99
NIST 15 October 1992 - FIPS

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Alvin G. Byars
Administrative

Submitted: 25 Oct 1992
Description:
NIST packet. FIPS approval comments. Oct 15, 1992.
Comments:
Handout Oct 92.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/1992-100
NIST 28 October 1992 - Validation

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: William Dashiell
Sponsor: Edward J. McIntosh
Administrative

Submitted: 4 Nov 1992
Description:
NIST packet. Validation questions (22-28). Oct 28, 1992.
Comments:
Faxed to McIntosh Nov 5, 1992.

Published:
Nov 1992

X11/SC11/1992-11
Minutes Subcommittee 11, October 1992

Discussed in: SC11 User Interface
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 10 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed 13 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC12/1992-37
mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 4

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Roger Partridge
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Superseded by: X11/1993-18, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 12 Nov 1992
Description:
mnemonicspace on OPEN. FEB 93: SC12/TG9 recommends SC12 submit to MDC. SC12 edited and reaffirmed as SC type A. Raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Nov 1992

Votes

• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-4, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 and X11/SC12/TG9/1992-8, Amendment to X11/SC12/92-4 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1992-28, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 32 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-28, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 3 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC11/1992-3
Minutes Subcommittee 11, June 1992

Discussed in: SC11 User Interface
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 12 Nov 1992

Published:
Nov 1992

Vote

• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 11 to accept this document passed unanimously.
  

X11/TG8/1992-5
Appeals Procedure, version 2

Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: John Godfrey
Sponsor: John Godfrey
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1992-21, Appeals Procedure, version 3
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1992-23, Appeals Procedure, version 4
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1992-28, Appeals Procedure, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1995-127, Appeals Procedure 1995, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1996-21, Appeals procedure 96
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1997-7, Appeals procedure 1997

Submitted: 12 Nov 1992
Description:
MDC Appeals Procedure.