X11/SC12/TG9/1996-6
User definable I/O handling, version 4b

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
JUN 96: this is the second of two options.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG2/1996-3
Miscellaneous character functions, version 2a

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1996-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2b
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1996-7, Miscellaneous character functions, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-21, Miscellaneous character functions, version 6

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
JUN 96: this is one of two options. SEPT 96: TG2 edits and accepts this option and recommends elevation to SC B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG2/1996-4
Miscellaneous character functions, version 2b

Discussed in: SC12/TG2 Internationalisation
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1996-7, Miscellaneous character functions, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1997-2, Miscellaneous character functions, Version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-4, Miscellaneous character functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-21, Miscellaneous character functions, version 6

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
JUNE 96: this is the second of two options. SEPT 96: SC12 elevated to type B (13:1:1).
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1996-2, Miscellaneous Character Functions and X11/SC12/TG2/1996-3, Miscellaneous character functions, version 2a passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1996-10
Operator overrides, version 12

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/1996-74, Operator overrides, version 13

Submitted: 21 Jun 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: editorial corrections made in SC12/TG2. MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 10 to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns) superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3 passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-34, Comparison Functions as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-12, Operator Overrides, version 1 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 5 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1992-25, Operator Overrides, version 2 and X11/SC12/TG2/1994-1, Operator Overrides, version 5 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to remand X11/SC12/1995-13, Operator Overrides, version 9 to Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-4, Operator Overrides, version 11 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-13, Operator Overrides, version 9 and X11/SC12/1996-1, Operator Overrides, version 10 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document with editorial correction as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1996-4, Operator Overrides, version 11 passed by a vote of 25 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1996-4, Operator Overrides, version 11 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1996-11
ssvn for user/group ID, version 4

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/1997-8, ssvn for user/group ID, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-10, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-11, ssvn for user/group ID, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-8, ssvn for user and group ID, version 8

Submitted: 18 Jul 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC12/TG7 amended and recommended reaffirmation as SC type A 3-0-2. SC12 remanded to TG. MAR 97: SC12/TG7 amended and recommended forwarding to MDC for acceptance as MDC type A 2-0-0.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn to Task Group 7 passed without dissent.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1992-1, Write Once Security ssvn passed by a vote of 2 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG7/1996-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG7/1995-1, ssvn for User and Group ID, version 1 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand this document to task group 7 superseding X11/SC12/1996-8, ssvn for user/group ID, version 3 passed without dissent.
  

X11/1996-48
Schuller remarks on X11.1

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 5 Sep 1994
Description:
"Remarks on M Standard 1994", 9-5-94, from G. Schuller. Remarks on many different numbered topics: 2. Details 3. Future and general enhancements 3.1. Network wide environment concept for parallel computing 3.2. Event processing 3.3. Remote JOB command and remote function calls 3.4. OMI 3.5. Special internal datatypes 3.6. Security functionality Proposal Global security ssvn construct, X11/SC12/96-12.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/SC12/1996-12
Global security ssvn construct

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Lawrence A. Ruh
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 18 Jul 1996
Description:
Addresses some of Schuller comments in the 1994-5 canvass (paragraph 3.6 of X11/96-48). Sept 96: SC12/TG7 recommends elevation to SC type C 4-0-1. SEPT 98: SC12/TG7 recommends demotion. SC12 failed to elevate to type C 0-7-1.
Published:
Aug 1996
May 1998

Vote

• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 failed by a vote of none in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/1996-50
Appeals Board X11.1 X11.2 decision

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 25 Jul 1996
Description:
Letter from ANSI, July 17, 1996, concerning the Appeal by Henry Heffernan to the ANSI Appeals Board of the Board of Standards Review's Appeals Decision to sustain approval of MDC X11.1 and MDC X11.2 as American National Standards. The appeal was denied. Jul 96: sent to canvass lists for X11.1 and X11.2
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/SC13/1996-10
Minutes Subcommittee 13, March 1996 revised

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Daniel Bormann
Sponsor: Daniel Bormann
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 29 Jul 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document superseding X11/SC13/1996-7, Minutes Subcommittee 13, March 1996 passed without dissent.
  

X11/1996-53
Letter to ANSI - ISO submision 960730

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Letter to ANSI from EdM, 30 July 1996. Request for ANSI to submit X11.1, 2, and 6, to ISO.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-54
Letter to ANSI - appeals by Henry Heffernan 960730

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Letter to ANSI from EdM, 30 July 1996. Request for guidance from ANSI concerning future appeals from HH about "lack of due process".
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-55
Letter to John Hill 960730

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Letter to John Hill from EdM, 30 July 1996. About guidance concerning following the appeals panel's recommendations. With copy of ANSI's suggestions (X11/96-56). Copy to Heffernan and ANSI.
Discussed:
X11/1996-24, Letter to John Hill 960408
X11/1996-38, Letter from John Hill 960516
X11/1996-39, Letter to Anne Caldas 960530
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-56
Letter from Anne Caldas - Re: John Hill 960730

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Email from Anne Caldas concerning John Hill and the Appeals Panel recommendations. Copy sent with X11/96-55 to John Hill, Heffernan, and ANSI, 30 July 96.
Discussed:
X11/1996-24, Letter to John Hill 960408
X11/1996-38, Letter from John Hill 960516
X11/1996-39, Letter to Anne Caldas 960530
X11/1996-55, Letter to John Hill 960730
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-46
Agenda MDC, September 1996

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-22
ANSI BSR presntation Ed de Moel 960404

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Oral presentation by EdM to ANSI BSR, 4 April 1996.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-23
ANSI BSR presntation Kate Schell 960404

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Oral presentation by Kate Schell at the ANSI BSR hearing on April 4, 1996.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-47
Report ANSI BSR hearing 960404

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Brief report of the ANSI hearing on 4 April 1966 of HH appeals against the approval by ANSI of X11.1 and X11.2 in December 1995. By Ed de Moel, 30 July 1996.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-59
ANSI response standard format 960521

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 31 Jul 1996
Description:
Email from Anne Caldas, ANSI, 21 May 1996. Concerning the format of the standard document - normative and informative parts.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-60
DT style record operations

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Bill Yaksick
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1997-2, Data record functions, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-2, Data record functions, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-3, Data record functions, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG3/1998-4, Data record functions, version 7

Submitted: 1 Aug 1996
Description:
Email 11 July 96 about DataTree style record operations.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-61
Ian Jones proposal

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-2, $O[rder] second argument

Submitted: 1 Aug 1996
Description:
EMAIL from Ian Jones, 5 July 96 SEPT 96: SC13/TG13 accepts as type C.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/1996-62
Minutes corrections

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Superseded

Submitted: 1 Aug 1996
Description:
Letter from Alan Frank, 1 July 1996. Many corrections to minutes of various groups published in the April post-meeting mailing. A better copy was published as X11/96-63.

X11/SC13/TG5/1996-5
Library functions corrections

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Administrative

Submitted: 1 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: MDC directed Library functions document editor to make these corrections.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as direction to the standard document editor to apply editorial corrections passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to present this document to MDC as editorial corrections passed 8 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC15/TG17/1996-4
M[UMPS] block structuring, version 6

Discussed in: SC15/TG17 Process Control
Proposer: Bob Isch
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Subcommittee Type B

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC15 fails to elevate to type A. SEPT 97: SC15 demotes to type C 15-3-5. SEPT 98: SC15/TG17 discussed. SC15 elevates to type B 5-4-4.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-6, Structured Programming, version 1 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 19 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG17/1995-4, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-100, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 4 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1995-4, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 5 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 20 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1995-4, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 5 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Seattle, Washington, on 19 September 1998, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG17/1995-4, M[UMPS] Block Structuring, version 5 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/1996-63
Minutes corrections, version 2

Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
Comments on the April 1996 post-meeting mailing.
Published:
Aug 1996

X11/TG17/1996-2
Canonic form of ssvn name

Discussed in: TG17 Interpretations
Proposer: David J. Marcus
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG13/1997-1, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG13/1997-2, Canonic form of ssvn name, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-1, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-26, Canonic form of ssvn name, version 5

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
Proposed as an MDC interpretation to be forwarded to subcommittee. SEP 96: MDC accepted as standing document.
Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as interpretation passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 6 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG2/1996-4
Pattern ranges, version 6

Discussed in: SC13/TG2 String Handling
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: David J. Whitten
Superseded by: X11/1997-3, Pattern ranges, version 7

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-5, Pattern Ranges, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-3, Pattern Ranges, version 1 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 7 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-17, Pattern Ranges, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG2/1994-5, Pattern Ranges, version 2 failed by a vote of 10 in favor, 10 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1995-10, Pattern Ranges, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-17, Pattern Ranges, version 3 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1996-1, Pattern Ranges, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1995-10, Pattern Ranges, version 4 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1996-1, Pattern Ranges, version 5 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 6 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG5/1996-6
Mathematics errors, version 3

Discussed in: SC13/TG5 Mathematics
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG5/1996-7, Mathematics errors, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-1, Mathematics errors, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-9, Mathematics errors, Version 6

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG5/1996-3, Mathematics Errors, version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG5/1995-11, Mathematics Errors, version 1 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/TG13/1996-4
$O[rder], unsubscripted, version 16

Discussed in: SC13/TG13 Traversal Of Data Structures
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-1, Order, unsubscripted, version 17
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1997-4, $O[rder], unsubscripted, Version 18
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-11, Local variables in ^$J[ob], Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-3, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 7
Superseded by: X11/1998-29, Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 8

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: TG13 amended and recommended as replacement type B. SC13 amended and remanded to TG.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-105, ORDER, Local as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1991-29, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 2 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1991-51, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 1 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1992-53, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 4 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1992-11, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 3 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1993-18, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 6 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-15, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 5 passed 20 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Houston, Texas, on 27 February 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1993-61, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 9 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-4, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 11 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 10 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 7 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-8, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 12 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-5, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 14 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-3, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 13 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand this document to task group 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1996-1, Un-Subscripted $O[rder], version 15 passed 18 in favor and 2 opposed.
  

X11/SC15/TG9/1996-5
Standard routineparameters, version 6

Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1997-2, Standard routineparameters, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1997-5, Standard routineparameters, Version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-9, Standard routineparameters, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-12, Standard routineparameters, version 10

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
Proposed as a replacement SC type B. SEPT 96: SC15/TG17 recommends elevation to SC type A. Minutes: X11/SC15/TG17/96-6, Standard Routineparameters: X11/SC15/96-20 (sic?). SC15 adopts as replacement type B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 8 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1994-8, Standard routineparameters, version 1 and X11/SC15/TG9/95-6.1, Standard routineparameters, version 2 passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-107, Standard routineparameters, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-103, Standard routineparameters, version 3 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 6 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/TG9/1996-1, Standard routineparameters, version 5 to task group 9 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-107, Standard routineparameters, version 4 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-1, Standard routineparameters, version 5 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1996-4
Output time out

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Gregory Vail
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-10, Output time out, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-6, Output time-out, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/1997-31, Output time out, version 4

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
Proposed as replacement SC type B. SEPT 96: SC12/TG9 amends and recommends acceptance as SC12 type B 7-0-1. SC12 accepts as replacement type B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-14, Time Out on W[rite] Command as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-14, Time Out on W[rite] Command passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1996-4
Leading zero in $FN[umber], version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1996-67, Leading zero in $FN[umber], version 4

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-7, Leading Zero in $FN[umber] Function, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 19 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-26, Leading Zero in $FN[umber] Function, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-7, Leading Zero in $FN[umber] Function, version 1 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1995-26, Leading Zero in $FN[umber] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 27 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1996-5
Negative subscripts in nameval, version 3

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Kate M. Schell
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1996-68, Negative subscripts in nameval, version 4

Submitted: 5 Aug 1996
Description:
Negative subscripts in namevalue. SEPT 96: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-16, Negative Subscripts Namevalue, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-28, Negative Subscripts Namevalue, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-16, Negative Subscripts Namevalue, version 1 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/1995-28, Negative Subscripts Namevalue, version 2 passed 27 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC14/1996-1
OMI extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 4

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1996-69, OMI extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
Sept 96: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-3, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 5 in favor and 2 opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-8, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-3, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 1 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-12, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-8, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 2 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-12, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 3 passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-12, OMI Extended $G[et] and $O[rder], version 3 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/1996-2
OMI international, version 3

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1996-70, OMI international, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: MDC raised to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-10, OMI International, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-13, OMI International, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-10, OMI International, version 1 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-13, OMI International, version 2 passed by a vote of 26 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-13, OMI International, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC14/1996-3
Agenda Subcommittee 14, September 1996

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

X11/SC14/TG4/1996-1
OMI reverse $Q[uery]

Discussed in: SC14/TG4 Open MUMPS Interconnect
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG14/1996-3, OMI reverse $Q[uery], version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-5, OMI reverse $Q[uery], Version 3
Superseded by: X11/1997-30, OMI Reverse $Q[uery], version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: TG4 recommended elevation to type B. SC14 makes it so.
Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 6 in favor and none opposed.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7
User definable I/O handling, version 4c

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-12, User definable I/O handlng, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-8, User definable I/O handling, Version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-7, User definable I/O handling, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1998-13, User definable I/O handling, version 8

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
This is the third of three options. SEPT 96: SC12/TG9 amends and recommends this option for acceptance as SC12 type A 7-0-1. SC12 remanded to TG.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand this document to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/TG9/1996-8
User definable I/O handling amendment

Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1996-11, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and naked indicator
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-9, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, Version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-6, Portable controlmnemonics, $T[est] and Naked Indicator, version 3

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
Proposed as amendment to X11/SC12/TG9/96-7 User definable I/O handling option 3. SEPT 96: SC12/TG9 discussed and amended and recommended acceptance as SC12 type A. SC12 elevates the part of the document referring to X11/95-95 to type B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 2 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1995-12, User Definable I/O Handling, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1995-5, User Definable I/O Handling, version 1 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 4 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c to task group 9 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-1, User Definable I/O Handling, version 3 passed without dissent.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document (part that relates to X11/95-95) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1996-7, User definable I/O handling, version 4c passed by a vote of 8 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC12/1996-9
Null mnemonicspace

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Lawrence A. Ruh
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC12/TG9 recommends elevation to SC12 type A without dissent. SC12 elevated to type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed without dissent.
  
• In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
  
• In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to remand X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 to Task Group 9 superseding X11/SC12/1992-22, Null Device, version 2 and X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device passed 8 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1993-41, R[ead] from Null Device as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4 passed by a vote of 4 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 16 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to recommend X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5 passed without dissent.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1996-8
Local variables in ^$J[ob], version 5

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
Proposed as replacement SC type A. SEPT 96: TG13 recommended as replacement type A. SC13 failed to accept as replacement type A.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC15/1994-24, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1995-13, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-47, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 2 failed by a vote of 9 in favor, 14 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1996-1, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 4 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1994-16, ssvn for Local Variable, version 2 and X11/SC13/1995-13, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 3 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1996-1, Local Variables in ^$J[ob], version 4 failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 11 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1996-15
Fix algoref, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-2, Fix algoref, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-13, Fix algoref, Version 4
Superseded by: X11/1998-5, Fix algoref, version 5

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC15 elevates to type B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-10, Fix algoref as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-10, Fix algoref as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 29 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1996-16
Routine indirection, version 5

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-3, Routine indirection, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-12, Routine indirection, Version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG16/1998-2, Generic indirection
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-11, Generic indirection, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC15 remanded to TG16.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1993-36, Routine Indirection, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 7 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1993-36, Routine Indirection, version 1 passed by a vote of 20 in favor, none opposed and 8 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 6 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 13 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 failed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to remand X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 to Task Group superseding X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 passed without dissent.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to rescind X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 superseding X11/SC15/1994-22, Routine Indirection, version 2 failed 5 in favor and 14 opposed.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-2, Routine Indirection, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1994-37, Routine Indirection, version 3 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC15/1996-2, Routine Indirection, version 4 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC15/1996-17
THEN command, version 2

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Wally Fort
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG17/1997-2, THEN command, version 3

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC15/TG17 recommends demotion to type C. SC15 makes it so.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1996-2, T[hen] Command as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 9 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1996-2, T[hen] Command as amended during reconsideration as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 4 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-106, If-Then-Else and X11/SC15/TG9/1996-2, T[hen] Command passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 11 opposed and 1 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1996-11
Pattern match string extraction II, version 4

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Sponsor: Arthur B. Smith
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-2, Pattern match string extraction II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG2/1998-1, Pattern match string extraction, version III/1
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-8, Pattern match string extraction, version III/2
Superseded by: X11/1998-27, Pattern match string extraction, version III/3

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
Pattern Match String Extraction version 2: proposed as replacement SC type B for Pattern Match String Extraction X11/SC13/TG2/96-3, and Pattern Match Algorithm X11/SC13/96-3. SEPT 96: TG2 amended and recommended as replacement SC B. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989, a motion before Subcommittee 1 to accept X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1 passed 27 in favor and 1 opposed.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC1/1989-8, Pattern Match, Extraction and X11/SC1/1989-18, Pattern Match, Value Extraction passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-1, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG1/1994-1, Comparison of REGEX and PATMAT and X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1994-2, Pattern Match String Extraction passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1995-7, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/WG3/1995-2, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 1 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 4 opposed and 11 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/1996-3, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1995-7, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG2/1996-3, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG2/1995-6, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 2 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1996-3, Pattern Match Algorithm, version 3 and X11/SC13/TG2/1996-3, Pattern Match String Extraction II, version 3 passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/TG4/1996-1
Event processing

Discussed in: SC15/TG4 Event Processing
Proposer: Arthur B. Smith
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG4/1997-1, Event processing, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG4/1997-4, Event processing, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG4/1998-1, Event processing, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1998-6, Event processing, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1998-28, Event processing, version 6

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: SC15 elevates to type B.
Published:
Aug 1996

Vote

• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/1996-30
OMI job, version 5

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1994-7, OMI JOB, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-2, OMI JOB, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1994-7, OMI JOB, version 1 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-7, OMI JOB, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-2, OMI JOB, version 2 passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1995-13, OMI JOB, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-7, OMI JOB, version 3 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1995-13, OMI JOB, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-7, OMI JOB, version 3 passed without dissent.
  

X11/1996-31
OMI multiple-transaction message, version 4

Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/1998-9, OMI, version 2 draft standard
Superseded by: X11/1998-22, OMI, version 2, version 2

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996

Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-4, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14 passed 7 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1995-9, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14 superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-4, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 1 passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC14/1995-14, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-9, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 2 passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 14 to recommend X11/SC14/1995-14, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1995-9, OMI Message for Multiple Transactions, version 2 passed without dissent.
  

X11/SC12/1996-13
Naming $M[UMPS] syntax errors, version 6

Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Proposed and defeated

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
MAR 96: sent to SC12 from SC15. SEPT 96: SC12 failed to elevate to type A. MAR 97: SC12 demoted to type C. SEPT 97: SC12 rescinded 14-0-3.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Reno, Nevada, on 12 June 1994, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-8, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 9 opposed and 10 abstaining.
  
• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG10/1994-10, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-8, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 1 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 11 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1995-5, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG10/1994-10, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 2 passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1995-35, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1995-5, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 3 failed by a vote of 5 in favor, 16 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG9/1996-3, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-35, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 4 failed 4 in favor and 7 opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-3, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 6 opposed and 2 abstaining.
  
• In San Diego, California, on 19 March 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12 superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-3, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 27 September 1997, a motion before Subcommittee 12 to rescind this document superseding X11/SC15/TG9/1996-3, Naming Syntax Errors Found by $M[UMPS] Function, version 5 passed by a vote of 14 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
  

X11/SC13/1996-12
Set $QS[ubscript] pseudofunction, version 6

Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-4, Set $QS[ubscript] pseudofunction, version 7
Superseded by: X11/1997-22, Set $QS[ubscript] pseudo function, Version 8

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SET $QSUBSCRIPT pseudo function to set a selected subscript of a namevalue. SEPT 96: SC13/TG13 recommended acceptance as SC type A. SC13 makes it so.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 29 January 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1994-9, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-5, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 1 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
  
• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1994-9, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 2 passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 3 opposed and 7 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before the full MDC to accept X11/SC13/1995-24, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 20 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  
• In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to recommend X11/SC13/1995-24, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A as amended superseding X11/SC13/TG13/1995-1, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 3 passed 16 in favor and none opposed.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to remand X11/SC13/1996-2, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 5 to task group 13 superseding X11/SC13/1995-24, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 4 passed 9 in favor and 3 opposed.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 13 to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13 superseding X11/SC13/1996-2, S[et] Pseudo Function $QS[ubscript], version 5 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 4 opposed and 5 abstaining.
  

X11/SC15/1996-18
Portable length limit strings, version 4

Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1997-4, Portable length limit strings, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1997-23, Portable length limit strings, Version 6

Submitted: 6 Aug 1996
Description:
SEPT 96: TG11 amended and recommended adoption as SC A. SC15 elevates to SC type A without the amendment.
Published:
Aug 1996

Votes

• In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/TG11/1995-2, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 7 opposed and 3 abstaining.
  
• In Boston, Massachusetts, on 23 March 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept X11/SC15/1996-6, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1995-36, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 2 passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
  
• In Toronto, Canada, on 29 September 1996, a motion before Subcommittee 15 to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15 superseding X11/SC15/1996-6, Portable Length Limit for Strings, version 3 passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.