X11/SC15/TG9/1992-2
N[ew] svn, version 1
Discussed in: SC15/TG9 Routine Structure
Proposer: Bernard E. Bishop
Sponsor: Bernard E. Bishop
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1992-3, N[ew] svn, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/TG9/1993-9, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1994-7, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/94-13.1, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 3
Superseded by: X11/1994-47, N[ew] svn $T[est], version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1993-3, N[ew] svn $X and $Y
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1993-4, N[ew] svn $D[evice] and $K[ey]
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG10/1993-4, N[ew] svn $R[eference]
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-3, N[ew] $R[eference]
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1997-10, N[ew] $R[eference], Version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1998-4, N[ew] $R[eference], version 3
Superseded by: X11/1998-30, N[ew] $R[eference], version 4
Submitted: 28 Aug 1992
Description:
NEW svn.
OCT 92: TG9 discussed, edited, and changed name to "NEW svn
extensions". Recommends that SC15 raise to type C.
Published:
Sep 1992
X11/SC13/1992-44
Subscript Function Discussion
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Administrative
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Discussion document concerning $QSUBSCRIPT, $QLENGTH, and
$SUBSCRIPT.
Published:
Sep 1992
X11/SC13/1992-45
Subscript Function, version 1A
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
$SUBSCRIPT 3-argument form. Possible replacement for
X11/SC13/91-18,19, X11/SC1/91-26 (SC type C) - ($QSUBSCRIPT,$QLENGTH,SUBSCRIPT).
Published:
Sep 1992
Vote
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC1/1991-26, Subscript Function, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
failed by a vote of 1 in favor, 16 opposed and 9 abstaining.
X11/SC13/1992-46
Subscript Function, version 1B
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Rod Dorman
Sponsor: Rod Dorman
Superseded
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
$SUBSCRIPT 2-argument form. Possible replacement for
X11/SC13/92-18,19, X11/SC1/91-26 (SC type C) - ($QSUBSCRIPT, $QLENGTH, $SUBSCRIPT).
Published:
Sep 1992
X11/SC12/1992-24
Collating Sequences, version 8
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-7, Collating Sequences, version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-23, Collating Sequences, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-30, Collating Sequences, version 12
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Alternate Collating Sequences.
Sept 92: passed to SC12 type A by mail ballot.
OCT 92: editorial changes made.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 10
to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns)
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3
passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1992-11, Collating Sequences, version 7 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
X11/SC12/1992-25
Operator Overrides, version 2
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG2/1994-4, Operator Overrides, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-9, Operator Overrides, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-2, Operator Overrides, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-13, Operator Overrides, version 9
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-4, Operator Overrides, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-10, Operator overrides, version 12
Superseded by: X11/1996-74, Operator overrides, version 13
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Operator overrides.
OCT 92: discussed and amended in SC12/TG2.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 10
to approve X11/SC1/TG1/1991-8, Collating Sequences, version 2 (sections related to ssvns)
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-3, Collating Sequences, version 1
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-11, Collating Sequences, version 3
passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/TG1/1991-26, Collating Sequences, version 4
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 6 in favor, 3 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1991-5, Collating Sequences, version 5
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1992-12, Operator Overrides, version 1 (mail ballot) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG2/1992-4, Collating Sequences, version 6
failed by a vote of 4 in favor, 5 opposed and 5 abstaining.
X11/SC15/1992-29
SQL Binding, version 5
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/1992-84, SQL Binding, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
SQL binding.
OCT 92: Raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 9
to accept X11/SC9/1990-11, Embedded SQL as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9
passed by a vote of 5 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 9
to accept X11/SC9/1990-12, SQL Binding, Memo as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9
passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 9
to accept X11/SC9/1991-13, SQL Binding, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 9
superseding X11/SC9/1990-12, SQL Binding, Memo
passed without dissent.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to forward X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2 to Subcommittee 13, Task Group 2
passed 26 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC15/TG7/92-2R, SQL Binding, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC9/1991-13, SQL Binding, version 1 and
X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2
passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to remand X11/SC15/TG7/1992-2, SQL Binding, version 2 to Task Group 2
passed without dissent.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC9/1989-8, SQL2/SQL3 Working Draft,
X11/SC4/1987-4, SQL Interfacing,
X11/SC9/1990-11, Embedded SQL,
X11/SC9/1991-6, SQL Memo January 1991,
X11/SC1/1991-31, SQL Binding - Syntax and
X11/SC15/1992-20, SQL Binding, version 4
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 6 abstaining.
X11/SC13/1992-49
$U[ct] Special Variable, version 4
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-31, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1993-4, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1994-1, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-22, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-44, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-2, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-21, $H[orolog] System Function II, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG6/1998-3, $H[orolog] system function, version 2.1
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
$UCT.
OCT 92: SC13/TG6 recommends that this replaces all previous
documents - X11/SC1/89-14, X11/SC13/91-13, X11/SC13/92-21, as a SC type B.
SC13 takes no action.
FEB 93: SC13/TG6 refused to recommend as a SC13 type A; recommends
as a replacement SC13 type B. Discussed in SC13.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to table X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn
passed 20 in favor and 9 opposed.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
failed by a vote of 2 in favor, 19 opposed and 9 abstaining.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-1, ^$H[orolog] ssvn
failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 38 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-22, CLOCK, version 1
passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 4 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-1, CLOCK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-63, CLOCK, version 2
passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to remand X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 to Task Group
superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2
passed 13 in favor and 11 opposed.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC1/1991-21, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 2
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1991-12, $U[ct] Special Variable, version 3
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-11
Default Environment, version 5
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Joop S. Duisterhout
Sponsor: Joop S. Duisterhout
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1993-2, Default Environment, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1993-20, Default Environment, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Default environment.
Oct 92: amended and reaffirmed as SC14 type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 7
to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1 (demotion) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 7
passed by a vote of 6 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 10
to approve X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1 as amended by Subcommittee 7
passed without dissent.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC7/TG1/1991-6, Default Environment, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-3, Default Environment, version 1
failed 1 in favor and 14 opposed.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC7/TG1/1991-6, Default Environment, version 2
passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 6 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3
passed 10 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to include X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4 in next submission for ANSI standard approval
superseding X11/SC14/1991-2, Default Environment, version 3
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/1992-3, Default Environment, version 4
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-8
Environment for Global Variables, version 2
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1993-3, Environment for Global Variables, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1993-21, Environment for Global Variables, version 4
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Global environment and naked reference.
OCT 92: raised to SC14 type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to include X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 in priority list for next ANSI submission
passed by a vote of 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 8 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14
passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to include X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1 in next submission for ANSI standard approval
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/TG3/1992-2, Environment for Global Variables, version 1
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-9
NEXT in OMI, version 2
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1993-4, NEXT in OMI, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1992-92, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1
Superseded by: X11/1993-14, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1, version 2
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Remove $NEXT from OMI.
Oct 92: raised to SC14 type A as amended.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1992-3, NEXT in OMI OPT 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14
passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to include X11/SC14/TG4/1992-3, NEXT in OMI OPT 2 in next submission for ANSI standard approval
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1992-3, NEXT in OMI OPT 2
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-10
OMI Character SET, version 2
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1993-5, OMI Character SET, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1992-92, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1
Superseded by: X11/1993-14, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1, version 2
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
OMI Character set.
Oct 92: raised to SC14 type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1992-5, OMI Character SET, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14
passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to include X11/SC14/TG4/1992-5, OMI Character SET, version 1 in next submission for ANSI standard approval
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1992-5, OMI Character SET, version 1
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-13
OMI 1.1, version 2
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Superseded by: X11/SC14/1993-6, OMI 1.1, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1992-92, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1
Superseded by: X11/1993-14, Re-Organized OMI Standard 1.1, version 2
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
OMI VERSION 1.1.
Oct 92: raised to SC14 type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept X11/SC14/TG4/1992-4, OMI 1.1, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 14
passed 11 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to include X11/SC14/TG4/1992-4, OMI 1.1, version 1 in next submission for ANSI standard approval
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 14
to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 14
superseding X11/SC14/TG4/1992-4, OMI 1.1, version 1
passed by a vote of 10 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
X11/SC14/1992-12
Agenda Subcommittee 14, October 1992
Discussed in: SC14 Networking and Communication
Proposer: Frederick L. Hiltz
Sponsor: Frederick L. Hiltz
Minutes, Reports, etcetera
Submitted: 31 Aug 1992
Description:
Agenda for SC 14 and Task Groups.
Comments:
Pre mtg Sept 92.
X11/SC13/1992-50
Two-Character Operators, version 2
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1992-66, Two-Character Operators, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-21, Two-Character Operators, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1994-4, Two-Character Operators, version 5
Submitted: 1 Sep 1992
Description:
Two character operators. Proposed by Bo Midberg in Sweden.
Oct 92: raised to SC13 type B.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC13/1991-2, Combination Operators as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 4 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1991-2, Combination Operators
passed by a vote of 9 in favor, 6 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1991-2, Combination Operators
passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 4 opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC12/TG0/1992-2
Subcommittee 12 Environment, Bylaws, version 3
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG0/1994-1, Bylaws Subcommittee 12
Submitted: 1 Sep 1992
Description:
OCT 92: Amended and raised to SC12 standing document.
Accepted by MDC as a standing document.
OCT 93: Amended and accepted as SC12 Scope.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/1991-34, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Scope of Work
passed unanimously.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to sd this document
superseding X11/1991-34, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Scope of Work and
X11/SC12/TG0/1992-1, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Bylaws, version 2
passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document as amended as a standing document
superseding X11/1991-34, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Scope of Work and
X11/SC12/TG0/1992-1, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Bylaws, version 2
passed unanimously.
- In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as amended
superseding X11/1991-34, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Scope of Work and
X11/SC12/TG0/1992-1, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Bylaws, version 2
passed without dissent.
- In Dublin, Ireland, on 25 October 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document
superseding X11/1991-34, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Scope of Work and
X11/SC12/TG0/1992-1, Subcommittee 12 Environment, Bylaws, version 2
passed without dissent.
X11/SC12/TG9/1992-9
Portable controlmnemonics, version 4
Discussed in: SC12/TG9 General Device Issues
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-4, Portable controlmnemonics, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-28, Portable controlmnemonics, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-34, Portable controlmnemonics, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-37, Portable controlmnemonics, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-1, Portable controlmnemonics, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1994-12, Portable controlmnemonics, version 10
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1994-8, Portable controlmnemonics, version 11
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1994-4, Portable controlmnemonics, version 12
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1994-5, Portable controlmnemonics, version 13
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-3, Portable controlmnemonics, version 14
Superseded by: X11/1995-95, Portable controlmnemonics, version 15
Submitted: 1 Sep 1992
Description:
Portable controlmnemonics and mnemonicspaces.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1991-3, Portable controlmnemonics, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/1991-29, Portable controlmnemonics, version 1
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 4 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/TG9/1992-3, Portable controlmnemonics, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/TG9/1991-3, Portable controlmnemonics, version 2
passed by a vote of 9 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
X11/TG8/92-16.1
Clarification of MDCC Status, version 1
Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Superseded by: X11/TG8/1992-18, Clarification of MDCC Status, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1992-89, Constitution November 1992
Superseded by: X11/1995-92, Constitution 1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Clarification of MDCC status.
Comments:
TG8 internal document.
X11/TG8/1992-18
Clarification of MDCC Status, version 2
Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Superseded by: X11/1992-89, Constitution November 1992
Superseded by: X11/1995-92, Constitution 1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Clarification of MDCC status.
Oct 92: MDC accepted as constitutional change.
Published:
Sep 1992
Vote
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a constitutional change
superseding X11/TG8/92-16.1, Clarification of MDCC Status, version 1
passed 46 in favor and none opposed.
X11/TG8/1992-17
Clarification of MDC Member Representative Status
Discussed in: TG8 Internal Procedures
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Superseded by: X11/1992-89, Constitution November 1992
Superseded by: X11/1995-92, Constitution 1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Clarification of MDC Member Representative status.
OCT 92: MDC accepted as constitutional change.
Published:
Sep 1992
Vote
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a constitutional change
passed 46 in favor and none opposed.
X11/SC12/1992-22
Null Device, version 2
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Denver W. Braughler
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-32, Null Device, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1994-6, Null Device, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-6, Null Device, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1995-16, Null Device, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-6, Null Device, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1996-9, Null mnemonicspace
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1997-3, Null mnemonicspace, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1997-7, Null mnemonicspace, Version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC12/TG9/1998-5, Null mnemonicspace, version 4
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Null device.
OCT 92: Raised to SC12 type A.
FEB 93: SC12/TG9 recommends submitting to MDC. SC12 made editorial
changes but voted not to submit to MDC yet.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed without dissent.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1
passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2
failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3
failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4
failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to table X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4
passed 14 in favor and none opposed.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1
passed by a vote of 7 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to recommend this document for consideration as MDC Type A
superseding X11/SC1/1991-47, Null Device, version 1
failed 1 in favor and 11 opposed.
X11/SC12/1992-27
The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 6
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Susan Schluederberg
Sponsor: Susan Schluederberg
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1993-33, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 7
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Effect of CLOSE $IO.
Oct 92: Failed to advance to MDC type A.
FEB 93: SC12/TG9 amended and recommended SC12 accept as replacement
SC12 type A. Remanded to TG for further editorial work.
Published:
Sep 1992
Jan 1993
Votes
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1 as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed without dissent.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-41, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 1
passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 19 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-12, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 2
failed by a vote of 7 in favor, 13 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-69, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 3
failed by a vote of 18 in favor, 16 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-46, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4
failed by a vote of 14 in favor, 20 opposed and 6 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC1/1991-46, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 5 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/1990-108, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 4
passed 11 in favor and 1 opposed.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1991-46, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 5
failed by a vote of 16 in favor, 11 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/1991-46, The Effect of C[lose] $I[o], version 5
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-37
Names for Errors, version 7
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Naming Existing Errors. RMDS version.
OCT 92: Accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-14, Names for Errors, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed 43 in favor and none opposed.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-76, Names for Errors, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-14, Names for Errors, version 2
passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-41, Names for Errors, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-98, Names for Errors, version 4
passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC15/1991-11, Names for Errors, version 6 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1991-41, Names for Errors, version 5
passed by a vote of 48 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC15/1991-11, Names for Errors, version 6 and
X11/SC15/1991-11A, ERROR NAMES VER 6
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-42
Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 5
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ichiro Wakai
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Elimination of formallist name duplication. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-33, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed 18 in favor and none opposed.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-33, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 1
passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2
passed by a vote of 32 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to recommend X11/SC1/1991-39, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A
superseding X11/SC1/1990-96, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 2
passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1991-41, Prohibition of Duplication of names in formallists, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-43
Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 5
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Harlan M. Stenn
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Clarify GOTO. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-88, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-88, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1
passed by a vote of 34 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2
passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to recommend X11/SC1/1991-40, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3 for consideration as MDC Type A
superseding X11/SC1/1990-97, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2
passed 32 in favor and none opposed.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1991-42, Clarification of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/SC12/1992-23
Device Handling Correction, version 3
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Thomas C. Salander
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/1993-4, Device Handling Correction, version 4
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Device Handling corrections.
Oct 92: Raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 2 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/1991-6, Device Handling Correction, version 1
passed by a vote of 12 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC12/1992-6, Device Handling Correction, version 2
passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
X11/SC12/1992-26
The Value of Special Variable $I[o], version 2
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Proposed and defeated
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Value of $IO.
Oct 92: Failed to reach SC12 type A.
Feb 93: SC12/TG9 recommends SC12 demotion to SC type C. SC12
demoted to type C.
JUNE 93: SC12/TG9 recommends SC12 rescind document. SC12 rescinded.
Published:
Sep 1992
May 1993
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1992-5, The Value of Special Variable $I[o], version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
passed by a vote of 13 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/1992-5, The Value of Special Variable $I[o], version 1
failed by a vote of 3 in favor, 4 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Portland, Oregon, on 28 February 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept this document (demotion) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC12/1992-5, The Value of Special Variable $I[o], version 1
passed by a vote of 16 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 20 June 1993,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to rescind this document
superseding X11/SC12/1992-5, The Value of Special Variable $I[o], version 1
passed by a vote of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
X11/SC13/1992-47
$Q[uery] Function Definition, version 2
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-3, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1993-2, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1993-4, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-48, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-2, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
$QUERY definition.
OCT 92: TG13 recommends SC13 raise to type C. SC13 amended and
raised to type C.
Published:
Sep 1992
Vote
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document as amended as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1992-26, $Q[uery] Function Definition, version 1
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC13/1992-48
$O[rder] Function Definition, version 2
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-4, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC13/TG13/1993-3, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-49, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-12, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 6
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-23, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 7
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1994-46, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 8
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1995-3, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1995-91, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 10
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
$ORDER definition.
OCT 92: accepted by SC13 task group. Automatically type C.
Published:
Sep 1992
Vote
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC13/1992-25, $O[rder] Function Definition, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
passed without dissent.
X11/SC15/1992-27
Error Processing, version 20
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Harlan M. Stenn
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/1993-5, Error Processing, version 21
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Error processing.
Also supersedes X11/SC1/TG5/91-1.
Oct 92: Raised to MDC type A.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG5/1987-1, Error Processing, version 6 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 4 opposed and 9 abstaining.
- In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-7, Alternative Error Trapping as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1988-23, Alternative Error Trapping and
X11/SC1/1988-44, Error Processing, version 8
passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed 11 in favor and 9 opposed.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to remand X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1 to Task Group 5 (automatic Type C status)
passed 15 in favor and 5 opposed.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2 as divided as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-3, Stack Modification, version 1
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-25, Stack Modification, version 2
passed by a vote of 16 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to remand X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12 to Task Group 5
superseding X11/SC1/1990-13, Error Processing, version 11
passed without dissent.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-45, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 1
passed 12 in favor and 5 opposed.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-80, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 2
failed by a vote of 15 in favor, 17 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-73, STACK, version 3
passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 10 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-37, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 4 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-93, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 3
passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 10 opposed and 7 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1991-38, STACK, version 5 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-94, STACK, version 4
failed by a vote of 19 in favor, 17 opposed and 8 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-75, Error Processing, version 12
passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 5 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC1/1991-55, Error Processing, version 14 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC1/1991-43, Error Processing, version 13
passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC15/1991-16, Error Processing, version 17B as a Type B document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC15/TG1/1991-1, Error Processing, version 16
passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 8 opposed and 6 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC15/1992-3, Error Processing, version 18
passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 2 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/TG5/1991-1, $Q[uit] Special Variable, version 5 and
X11/SC15/1992-19, Error Processing, version 19
passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 3 opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC15/1992-28
Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: James Baldwin Domingo
Sponsor: Thomas C. Salander
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-23, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1995-31, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 2
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1996-8, Rewording of Definition of G[oto] Command, version 3
Superseded by: X11/1996-57, GOTO rewording, version 4
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
GOTO ambiguity.
Oct 92: Raised to SC15 type C.
JUNE 95: SC15 considers this superseded by X11/SC15/95-23.
Published:
Sep 1992
Jan 1993
Apr 1995
Votes
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC15/1992-16, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1
passed by a vote of 24 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Chicago, Illinois, on 4 June 1995,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to rescind this document
superseding X11/SC15/1992-16, Ambiguity in Definition of G[oto] Command, version 1
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-44
Library Proposal, version 1
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Jonathan P. Diamond
Sponsor: Jonathan P. Diamond
Superseded by: X11/1993-2, Library Proposal, version 2
Superseded by: X11/1993-26, Library Proposal, version 3
Superseded by: X11/TG14/1993-2, Library Proposal, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1993-32, Library Proposal, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1994-3, Library Proposal, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-13, Library Proposal, version 7
Superseded by: X11/1994-23, Library Proposal, version 8
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
Library proposal.
OCT 92: discussed in MDC/TG14.
Published:
Sep 1992
X11/SC12/1992-28
mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 3
Discussed in: SC12 Environment
Proposer: Roger Partridge
Sponsor: Roger Partridge
Superseded by: X11/SC12/1992-37, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 4
Superseded by: X11/1993-18, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 10 Sep 1992
Description:
mnemonicspace on OPEN.
Published:
Sep 1992
Votes
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 12
passed by a vote of 15 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC12/1992-4, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 2 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC11/TG7/1991-1, mnemonicspace on O[pen] Command, version 1 and
X11/SC12/TG9/1992-8, Amendment to X11/SC12/92-4
passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
X11/1992-45
Transaction Processing III, version 5
Discussed in: SC15/TG3 Transaction Processing
Proposer: Carl B. Lazarus
Sponsor: Carl B. Lazarus
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 14 Sep 1992
Description:
Transaction Processing III, RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1990-5, Transaction Processing as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-11, Transaction Processing, Amendment October 1990 as divided (3.3)
passed by a vote of 21 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-11, Transaction Processing, Amendment October 1990 as divided (3.1)
passed by a vote of 20 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 11 in favor, 9 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.1)
passed without dissent.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.2)
passed without dissent.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to adopt X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991 as divided (3.3)
passed without dissent.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1990-13, Transaction Processing, Amendment January 1991,
X11/SC1/TG17/1990-14, Transaction Processing, version 3 and
X11/SC1/TG17/1991-1, Transaction Processing II, version 2
passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to table X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2
superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 and
X11/SC1/TG17/1991-10, Transaction Processing, III Cover-Letter
passed without dissent.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1991-9, Transaction Processing III, version 1 and
X11/SC1/TG17/1991-10, Transaction Processing, III Cover-Letter
passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC15/1991-14, Transaction Processing III, version 3 as amended as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/TG17/1990-15, Transaction Processing Issues and
X11/SC1/TG17/1991-11, Transaction Processing III, version 2
passed by a vote of 39 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1992-15, Transaction Processing III, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-46
Device Handling, version 3
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
Device Handling. RMDS version. Combines X11/89-14 and
X11/90-30.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11.1/1987-6, Device Handling, version 1.4 (also known as X11/SC1/TG3/87-2) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, none opposed and 9 abstaining.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to rescind X11.1.1/1985-14, Device Handling, version 1 (Provisional)
passed without dissent.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/1988-6, Device Handling, version 1.7 (Definitely) (also known as X11.1/87-33) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11.1.1/1985-14, Device Handling, version 1 (Provisional)
passed by a majority.
- In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-27, Device Formalization, version 1 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/TG3/1988-1, Device Handling Format
failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 32 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-34, Device Formalization, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-27, Device Formalization, version 1
passed by a vote of 22 in favor, 8 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-55, Device Formalization, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-34, Device Formalization, version 2
passed by a vote of 21 in favor, 5 opposed and 11 abstaining.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1990-18, Device Formalization, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1989-55, Device Formalization, version 3
passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 5 opposed and 8 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1989-14, Device Handling, version 2 and
X11/1990-30, Device Formalization, version 5
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-47
R[ead] Command, version 4
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
READ into glvn. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed unanimously.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1988-40, R[ead] Command, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1
passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1988-40, R[ead] Command, version 2 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11.1/1987-34, R[ead] Command, version 1
passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1989-9, R[ead] Command, version 3
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-48
Structured System Variables, version 10
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
Structured System Variables. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended (first part, $TEXT extension) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 34 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to remand X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as amended to Task Group 13 (second part, FILE command)
passed 24 in favor and 16 opposed.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE) as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
failed by a vote of 8 in favor, 22 opposed and 9 abstaining.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to rescind X11/SC1/1988-54, Routine Editing as divided (FILE)
passed unanimously.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1988-59, Structured System Variables, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 5 opposed and 10 abstaining.
- In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-31, Structured System Variables, version 4 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-1, Structured System Variables, version 3 and
X11/SC1/1986-6A, Structured System Variables, version 1
passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-54, Structured System Variables, version 5 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-31, Structured System Variables, version 4 and
X11/SC1/TG4/1987-1, Structured System Variables, version 1.5
passed by a vote of 35 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-9, Structured System Variables, version 6 and
X11.1/1987-32, Structured System Variables, version 1.3
failed by a vote of 25 in favor, 17 opposed and 9 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-9, Structured System Variables, version 6 and
X11.1/1987-32, Structured System Variables, version 1.3
failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 10 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1991-22, Structured System Variables, version 8 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-17, Structured System Variables, version 7
passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1991-21, Structured System Variables, version 9
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-49
Operand versus Argument, version 5
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
operand not= argument. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-53, Operand versus Argument, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-19, Operand versus Argument, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-53, Operand versus Argument, version 1
passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1990-61, Operand versus Argument, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-19, Operand versus Argument, version 2
passed 24 in favor and none opposed.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1990-59, Operand versus Argument, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-50
$G[et] Function with Default, version 4
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
$GET with default. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-60, $G[et] Function with Default, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1
passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In San Diego, California, on 25 January 1991,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1990-60, $G[et] Function with Default, version 2 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1990-21, $G[et] Function with Default, version 1
passed by a vote of 30 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1991-6, $G[et] Function with Default, version 3
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-51
Exponentiation Operator, version 5
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
exponentiation. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1988-36, Exponentiation Operator, version 2 (also known as MDC-4) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 1 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC1/1989-14, Exponentiation Operator, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1988-36, Exponentiation Operator, version 2 and
X11.1/1986-11, Exponentiation Operator, version 1
passed by a vote of 44 in favor, 4 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1989-10, Exponentiation Operator, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-52
M[erge] Command, version 3
Discussed in: MDC the MUMPS Development Committee
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
MERGE command. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG4/1987-2, Subtree Copying, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding MDC-32, Subtree Copying, version 1
passed by a vote of 27 in favor, 7 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-29, M[ove] Command Subcommittee B as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1988-45, M[ove] Command
failed by a vote of 14 in favor, 23 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/89-33A, M[erge] Command, version 1 as amended as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1989-29, M[ove] Command Subcommittee B
passed by a vote of 41 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/1990-3, M[erge] Command, version 2 (also known as X11/SC1/89-52) as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding MDC-32, Subtree Copying, version 1,
X11/SC1/89-33A, M[erge] Command, version 1 and
X11/SC1/TG4/1987-2, Subtree Copying, version 2
passed by a vote of 31 in favor, 8 opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1990-3, M[erge] Command, version 2
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-53
S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 7
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
SET $EXTRACT. RMDS version. Merges X11/90-2 and X11/92-35.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 5 November 1987,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1987-38, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1
passed by a vote of 33 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Washington, District of Columbia, on 10 November 1988,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to remand X11/SC1/1988-37, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 3 to Task Group 14
passed by a show of hands.
- In Seattle, Washington, on 15 May 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1 (also known as X11/SC1/89-15) as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
passed unanimously.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/1990-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 6 (also known as X11/SC1/89-15) as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1988-37, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 3,
X11/SC1/1988-58, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 5,
MDC-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 1 and
X11/SC1/1987-38, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 2
passed by a vote of 42 in favor, none opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC13/1991-9, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC1/1991-60, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 1
passed 20 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC13/1992-12, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC13/1991-9, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 2
passed 48 in favor and none opposed.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1990-2, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, version 6 and
X11/1992-35, S[et] $E[xtract] PseudoFunction, Typographical Correction, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-54
S[et] Command, version 6
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
SET command straightened out. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-64, S[et] Command, version 1 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-52, $P[iece] Modification
passed 13 in favor and 12 opposed.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC1/1991-8, S[et] Command, version 2
passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC13/1992-3, S[et] Command, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3
passed by a vote of 38 in favor, 3 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to recommend X11/SC13/1992-3, S[et] Command, version 4 for consideration as MDC Type A
superseding X11/SC1/1991-64, S[et] Command, version 3
passed by a vote of 18 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1992-10, S[et] Command, version 5
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-55
patcode E, version 6
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
patcode E. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-24, patcode E, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed 19 in favor and 1 opposed.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-9, patcode E, version 2 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-24, patcode E, version 1
passed by a vote of 38 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 12
to accept X11/SC1/1991-67, patcode E, version 3 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 12
superseding X11/SC1/1991-9, patcode E, version 2
passed 16 in favor and none opposed.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC15/1991-4, patcode E, version 4 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1991-67, patcode E, version 3
passed by a vote of 37 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1992-12, patcode E, version 5
passed without dissent.
X11/1992-56
Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 5
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Sponsor: Ed J.P.M. de Moel
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 15 Sep 1992
Description:
lower-case for $FNUMBER. RMDS version.
OCT 92: accepted as replacement MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere as divided (exponential notation) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 13 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere as divided ($FNUMBER) as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 17 in favor, 1 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-7, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 1 as amended as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1990-23, Lower Case Everywhere
passed by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and 5 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC1/1991-65, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC1/1991-7, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 1
passed 23 in favor and 2 opposed.
- In Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, on 5 February 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept X11/SC15/1991-3, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 3 as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC1/1991-65, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 2
passed by a vote of 39 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/1992-11, Lower Case Directives in $FN[umber] Function, version 4
passed without dissent.
X11/SC13/1992-55
Naked $P[iece]
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Michael J. Harney
Sponsor: Gretchen L. Bradfield
Proposed and defeated
Submitted: 17 Sep 1992
Description:
Proposal to create a naked $PIECE function for use with
non-global references.
OCT 95: SC13 proposed and defeated.
Published:
Nov 1992
Dec 1995
Vote
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 26 October 1995,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
failed by a vote of none in favor, 21 opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC15/1992-31
YG Extensions
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: David B. Brown
Sponsor: Yoshinori Yamashita
Superseded by: X11/SC15/1993-11, Y Extensions, version 3
Submitted: 17 Sep 1992
Description:
YG Extensions.
Feb 93: SC12/TG2 formed working group to discuss this and Y
Extensions X11/SC15/93-11.
Published:
Nov 1992
Votes
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1989-43, Y Extensions, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 1
passed by a vote of 28 in favor, 12 opposed and 2 abstaining.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC1/1989-43, Y Extensions, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15
passed 24 in favor and none opposed.
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept X11/SC1/1989-43, Y Extensions, version 1 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15
passed by a vote of 22 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to accept this document as a Type C document of Subcommittee 15
superseding X11/SC1/1989-43, Y Extensions, version 1
passed by a vote of 18 in favor, none opposed and 7 abstaining.
X11/SC11/TG4/1992-11
Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 2
Discussed in: SC11/TG4 Windowing API
Proposer: Guy Gardner
Sponsor: Guy Gardner
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-1, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 3
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4
Superseded by: X11/SC11/1993-3, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5
Superseded by: X11/1993-32, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6
Superseded by: X11/1994-9, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, ANSI
Superseded by: X11/1996-3, ANSI/MDC X11.6-1994
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-12, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 4 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-15, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 5 Formalization
Superseded by: X11/SC11/TG4/WG6/1993-17, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, version 6 Formalization
Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
MUMPS Windowing API. Proposed as replacement for X11/SC11/TG4/92-8.
OCT 92: SC11 approved as replacement type B.
Comments:
Special mailing by IDX, September 1992, to SC11.
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 11
to accept X11/SC11/TG4/1992-8, Windowing Application Programmer Interface as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11
superseding X11/SC11/TG4/WG2-1, User Interface Approach,
X11/SC11/TG4/WG2/1991-2, Windowing Application Programmer Interface, Approaches and
X11/SC11/TG4/WG2/1991-3, Window Program Example
passed by a vote of 25 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 11
to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 11
superseding X11/SC11/TG4/1992-8, Windowing Application Programmer Interface
passed by a vote of 23 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 abstaining.
X11/SC15/1992-30
External Calls, version 12
Discussed in: SC15 Programming Structures
Proposer: Peter M. Kuzmak
Sponsor: Michael S. McIntyre
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-1, RMDS, version 5
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-3, RMDS, version 6
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1993-6, RMDS, version 7
Superseded by: X11/TG6/1994-1, RMDS, version 9
Superseded by: X11/1996-4, ANSI/MDC X11.1-1995
Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
External routine calling from within MUMPS.
OCT 92: Raised to MDC type A.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Votes
- In Arlington, Texas, on 23 February 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-1, External Interface as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
failed by a vote of 11 in favor, 26 opposed and 6 abstaining.
- In Andover, Massachusetts, on 4 October 1989,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-2, External Calls, version 2 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1989-1, External Interface and
X11/SC1/1989-28, External Calls, version 1
failed by a vote of 13 in favor, 26 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In San Francisco, California, on 26 January 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1989-3, External Calls, version 3 as a Type B document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1988-30, Alternate Procedure NameSpace and
X11/SC1/TG8/1989-2, External Calls, version 2
passed by a vote of 24 in favor, 2 opposed and 11 abstaining.
- In Orlando, Florida, on 10 June 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/TG8/1990-1, External Calls, version 4 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1989-3, External Calls, version 3
failed by a vote of 6 in favor, 41 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Amsterdam, The Netherlands, on 9 October 1990,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to table X11/SC1/TG8/1990-2, External Calls, version 5
superseding X11/SC1/TG8/1990-1, External Calls, version 4
passed without dissent.
- In New Orleans, Louisiana, on 2 June 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 1
to accept X11/SC1/1991-33, External Calls, version 8 as a Type A document of Subcommittee 1
superseding X11/SC1/1991-17, External Calls, version 7
passed by a vote of 39 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In St. Louis, Missouri, on 24 October 1991,
a motion before Subcommittee 15
to recommend X11/SC1/1991-69, External Calls, version 9 for consideration as MDC Type A
superseding X11/SC1/1989-51, External Calls, Counterproposal, version 2 and
X11/SC1/1991-33, External Calls, version 8
passed by a vote of 31 in favor, none opposed and 1 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before the full MDC
to accept this document as a Type A extension of the MUMPS Development Committee
superseding X11/SC15/1992-12, External Calls, version 11
passed by a vote of 41 in favor, none opposed and 3 abstaining.
X11/SC13/1992-51
Invalid Subscripts, version 4
Discussed in: SC13 Data Management & Manipulation
Proposer: Alan D. Frank
Sponsor: Alan D. Frank
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-16, Invalid Subscripts, version 5
Superseded by: X11/SC13/1993-37, Invalid Subscripts, version 6
Submitted: 25 Sep 1992
Description:
References with invalid subscripts.
OCT 92: SC13 raised to type B.
Comments:
Kate Schell special mailing Sept 92.
Votes
- In Phoenix, Arizona, on 14 June 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept X11/SC13/1992-10, Invalid Subscripts, version 3 as a Type C document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1991-30, Invalid Subscripts, version 2
passed by a vote of 10 in favor, 3 opposed and 4 abstaining.
- In Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 21 October 1992,
a motion before Subcommittee 13
to accept this document as a Type B document of Subcommittee 13
superseding X11/SC13/1992-10, Invalid Subscripts, version 3
passed by a vote of 15 in favor, 2 opposed and 1 abstaining.